Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specification Extension instead of Vendor Extension #657

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2016
Merged

Specification Extension instead of Vendor Extension #657

merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2016

Conversation

ralfhandl
Copy link
Contributor

#643 for V3.0

@DavidBiesack
Copy link

👍

@webron
Copy link
Member

webron commented Apr 19, 2016

I think we should potentially change the structure of the extensions, so I'd wait with the name change proposal alone.

@jharmn
Copy link
Contributor

jharmn commented Apr 25, 2016

@webron I'd say the name change doesn't hurt, we've all agreed it should change anyways. If there are structural changes, we can address that separately (ready: easier to review PR).

👍

@webron
Copy link
Member

webron commented May 19, 2016

👍

1 similar comment
@fehguy
Copy link
Contributor

fehguy commented May 20, 2016

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants