Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sandboxfs: remove #317681

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024
Merged

sandboxfs: remove #317681

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

jeremyschlatter
Copy link
Contributor

@jeremyschlatter jeremyschlatter commented Jun 6, 2024

Description of changes

Removes sandboxfs.

sandboxfs was an experiment to increase sandboxing performance in bazel, but it never reached a stable release.

The author of sandboxfs left Google in 2020 and there have been no updates to it since then.

bazel dropped sandboxfs in October 2023. To quote their release notes:

The sandboxfs sandboxing strategy is removed. It hadn't been
maintained for a long time, it didn't work for most users and it was
not consistently faster while being complex to set up. sandboxfs
performance is heavily dependent on the specific setup (setup costs
are lower, but you have to pay a penalty for the use of each input)
and there are scenarios where it is faster and scenarios where it is
slower. Overall it is not worth its weight.

- bazelbuild/bazel@217fafe

No other packages in nixpkgs depend on sandboxfs.

Gentoo has also dropped sandboxfs from their distribution: https://bugs.gentoo.org/930790

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

sandboxfs was an experiment to increase sandboxing performance in bazel,
but it never reached a stable release.

The author of sandboxfs left Google in 2020 and there have been no
updates to it since then.

bazel dropped sandboxfs in the bazel 7 release. To quote their release
notes:

    The sandboxfs sandboxing strategy is removed. It hadn't been
    maintained for a long time, it didn't work for most users and it was
    not consistently faster while being complex to set up. sandboxfs
    performance is heavily dependent on the specific setup (setup costs
    are lower, but you have to pay a penalty for the use of each input)
    and there are scenarios where it is faster and scenarios where it is
    slower. Overall it is not worth its weight.

    - bazelbuild/bazel@217fafe
@Aleksanaa Aleksanaa merged commit 91cbda4 into NixOS:master Jun 21, 2024
20 checks passed
@jeremyschlatter jeremyschlatter deleted the remove-sandboxfs branch June 21, 2024 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants