Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python312Packages.prometheus-fastapi-instrumentator: init at 7.0.0 #317014

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bcdarwin
Copy link
Member

@bcdarwin bcdarwin commented Jun 3, 2024

Description of changes

Add Prometheus FastAPI instrumentator.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 馃憤 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4111

@bcdarwin bcdarwin force-pushed the init-python3-prometheus-fastapi-instrumentator branch from 418e938 to d2d7e35 Compare June 18, 2024 19:22
@bcdarwin bcdarwin force-pushed the init-python3-prometheus-fastapi-instrumentator branch from d2d7e35 to fdcb3bc Compare June 18, 2024 19:23
Copy link
Contributor

@dani0854 dani0854 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed points
  • package path fits guidelines
  • package name fits guidelines
  • package version fits guidelines
  • package builds on x86_64-linux
  • meta.description is set and fits guidelines
  • meta.license fits upstream license
  • meta.platforms is set
  • meta.maintainers is set
  • source is fetched using the appropriate function

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/1761

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants