Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: add details on mapAttrsRecursive[Cond] #293509

Merged

Conversation

fricklerhandwerk
Copy link
Contributor

from first reading it wasn't clear that f also takes the current
attribute path. also the value f receives is tricky due to how the
condition is evaluated.

Description of changes

updated documentation

Things done

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

from first reading it wasn't clear that `f` also takes the current
attribute path. also the value f receives is tricky due to how the
condition is evaluated.
lib/attrsets.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@DanielSidhion DanielSidhion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only very minor comments.

lib/attrsets.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/attrsets.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fricklerhandwerk and others added 2 commits March 6, 2024 10:19
Co-authored-by: Daniel Sidhion <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Sidhion <[email protected]>
@fricklerhandwerk fricklerhandwerk merged commit 73c0b48 into NixOS:master Mar 6, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants