Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

opengfw: init at 0.4.0 (+NixOS module) #290008

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

eum3l
Copy link

@eum3l eum3l commented Feb 19, 2024

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@ifurther
Copy link
Contributor

Please update the title, and squash comment

@eum3l eum3l changed the title opengfw: init at 0.2.0 (+nix module) opengfw: init at 0.2.3 (+NixOS module) Mar 16, 2024
@eum3l eum3l force-pushed the add-opengfw branch 3 times, most recently from a2a7154 to a7a00c4 Compare March 22, 2024 12:38
@eum3l eum3l changed the title opengfw: init at 0.2.3 (+NixOS module) opengfw: init at 0.3.0 (+NixOS module) Mar 22, 2024
@ifurther
Copy link
Contributor

Please split the maintainers and application comment

@eum3l eum3l changed the title opengfw: init at 0.3.0 (+NixOS module) opengfw: init at 0.3.1 (+NixOS module) Apr 2, 2024
@eum3l eum3l force-pushed the add-opengfw branch 3 times, most recently from 1792ae7 to c99b4d5 Compare April 3, 2024 14:52
@eum3l eum3l force-pushed the add-opengfw branch 3 times, most recently from faab516 to 5c53905 Compare May 8, 2024 12:13
@eum3l eum3l changed the title opengfw: init at 0.3.3 (+NixOS module) opengfw: init at 0.3.4 (+NixOS module) May 8, 2024
@eum3l eum3l changed the title opengfw: init at 0.3.4 (+NixOS module) opengfw: init at 0.4.0 (+NixOS module) May 9, 2024
@eum3l eum3l force-pushed the add-opengfw branch 2 times, most recently from b73c238 to d0a4346 Compare May 12, 2024 13:20
@eum3l eum3l force-pushed the add-opengfw branch 2 times, most recently from 19f44a7 to 93dd63a Compare June 5, 2024 12:31
@eum3l eum3l force-pushed the add-opengfw branch 2 times, most recently from 00a8901 to 7d1148b Compare June 13, 2024 09:17
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4116

pkgs/by-name/op/opengfw/package.nix Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/by-name/op/opengfw/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/by-name/op/opengfw/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@0x61nas 0x61nas self-requested a review June 25, 2024 08:14
@eum3l eum3l force-pushed the add-opengfw branch 2 times, most recently from 5b5162e to b908938 Compare July 1, 2024 10:05
@JohnRTitor
Copy link
Contributor

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 290008 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package blacklisted:
  • nixos-install-tools
1 package built:
  • opengfw

Copy link
Contributor

@JohnRTitor JohnRTitor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Built NixOS manual looks good. @Aleksanaa do you want to take a look?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants