-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Tom's regional DA dycore fix #26
Conversation
…nl into boundary file
…nl into boundary file Co-authored-by: Tom Black <[email protected]>
@@ -733,6 +735,24 @@ subroutine setup_regional_BC(Atm, dt_atmos & | |||
enddo | |||
enddo | |||
endif | |||
! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this specifically tailored to GFDL-MP? How about other microphysics schemes that use different tracers?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it has been run for Thompson MP as well as GFDL MP.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, thanks.
Thanks for including my changes Jun. Not sure where this happened and no problem if it doesn't make sense to include in this PR since this file wasn't touched and I can make another one but theres an additional change for when not using the INTERNAL_NML_FILE definition. In the file model/multi_gases.F90 at line 42 it should be |
Apologies, copy paste error. It should be: |
I see. We've about to commit for Tom's fix. I'd suggest to create another
dycore PR, we will get it in in next commit.
…On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:30 PM Daniel Holdaway ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for including my changes Jun. Not sure where this happened and no
problem if it doesn't make sense to include in this PR since this file
wasn't touched and I can make another one but theres an additional change
for when not using the INTERNAL_NML_FILE definition. In the file
model/multi_gases.F90 at line 42 it should be use fms_mod, only:
check_nml_error, open_namelist_file. We'll work to get away from using
this compiler definition since it's not recommended/supported but we could
do with keeping it functional for now. I'll approve anyway in case you want
to leave it out of this PR.
Apologies, copy paste error. It should be:
use fms_mod, only: check_nml_error, open_namelist_file, close_file
on that line
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#26 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7D6TN2Y4JAV4CIJD254RDR3SBYZANCNFSM4OHWZUMA>
.
|
Related PRs:
fv3atm #132
ufs-weather-model #154