Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add optional Wave-Ice Coupling to NUOPC cap #52

Closed
DeniseWorthen opened this issue Aug 24, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #51 or ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#1381
Closed

Add optional Wave-Ice Coupling to NUOPC cap #52

DeniseWorthen opened this issue Aug 24, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #51 or ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#1381

Comments

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

Implementation of Wave-Ice Coupling between WW3 and CICE6 requires added exchange fields between WW3 and CICE6 in the NUOPC cap. These field exchanges need to be optionally allowed only when WW3-CICE6 coupling is desired.
This was referenced Aug 24, 2022
Merged
Merged
@junwang-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeniseWorthen So this update allows two way wave/sea-ice coupling, is there documentation available on improving ww3/sea-ice forecast with this update?

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I know there are papers that Lettie and CC did regarding the impact of wave-ice coupling (in CESM) but I don't know the literature well. I think it would be a very interesting feature to test---and see the impact it has on sea-ice predictions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@junwang-noaa @DeniseWorthen