Correction of another requirement for cluster configuration on RHEL8

[rubenlopesms]

No description provided.

[prmerger-automator]

@rubenlopesms : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit 95acb3b:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
articles/sap/workloads/high-availability-guide-rhel-pacemaker.md	✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Learn support channel

[ShannonLeavitt]

@rdeltcheva

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

[rdeltcheva]

The proposed command change is dropping the totem token parameter - that is really important part of the command. If ommited, it will lead to cluster instability. Also, the command is in the section applicableto both RHEL8 and RHEL9, not only RHEL 8. Could you please let me know what is prompting this requested change?

[rdeltcheva]

The command should not drop the token.

[denrea]

@rubenlopesms @rdeltcheva

Can you review this old PR and determine whether it needs to be closed or merged?

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

[ShannonLeavitt]

@rubenlopesms - Could you respond to the comment from @rdeltcheva? If we don't hear from you, we will need to close this PR.

[rubenlopesms]

Hello @ShannonLeavitt @rdeltcheva Sorry, I was on vacations. I was doing some lab tests for a Training and I saw that the command didn't worked as explained. So, it's why I decided to request the change.

[Court72]

I sent an email to the content owner today.

[Court72]

The content owner responded:

"We cannot drop the token in the command. It is necessary so that the cluster can survive platform maintenance events.  So please close this PR."