Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why the template-based deformation method performs significantly worse on the SCOT-HEART dataset compared to the ResNet Decoder + Marching, as reported in the paper? #2

Open
chaoran4532 opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Why the template-based deformation method performs significantly worse on the SCOT-HEART dataset compared to the ResNet Decoder + Marching, as reported in the paper? #2

chaoran4532 opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@chaoran4532
Copy link

Why the template-based deformation method performs significantly worse on the SCOT-HEART dataset compared to the ResNet Decoder + Marching, as reported in the paper? CorticalFlow has high DSC and CH metrics in cortical reconstruction. Is this performance difference due to the smaller number of points used in your method, or is it related to the inherent characteristics of the dataset itself?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@chaoran4532