You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why the template-based deformation method performs significantly worse on the SCOT-HEART dataset compared to the ResNet Decoder + Marching, as reported in the paper?
#2
Open
chaoran4532 opened this issue
May 3, 2024
· 0 comments
Why the template-based deformation method performs significantly worse on the SCOT-HEART dataset compared to the ResNet Decoder + Marching, as reported in the paper? CorticalFlow has high DSC and CH metrics in cortical reconstruction. Is this performance difference due to the smaller number of points used in your method, or is it related to the inherent characteristics of the dataset itself?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Why the template-based deformation method performs significantly worse on the SCOT-HEART dataset compared to the ResNet Decoder + Marching, as reported in the paper? CorticalFlow has high DSC and CH metrics in cortical reconstruction. Is this performance difference due to the smaller number of points used in your method, or is it related to the inherent characteristics of the dataset itself?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: