Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move JWE to request body instead of header. #487

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2019
Merged

Move JWE to request body instead of header. #487

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2019

Conversation

vimota
Copy link
Contributor

@vimota vimota commented Feb 21, 2019

We're moving the JWT to the body from the header, as the current Mediator framework in the Web Tier doesn't pass headers to the Service/Controllers.

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ FROM gcr.io/kaggle-images/python-tensorflow-whl:1.12.0-py36 as tensorflow_whl
FROM continuumio/anaconda3:5.2.0

ADD clean-layer.sh /tmp/clean-layer.sh
ADD patches/ /tmp/patches/
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed this since it was causing a lot of layers to be rebuilt if patches was ever changed, and I couldn't see any use of /tmp/patches - but please let me know if there's something I'm overlooking!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@rosbo rosbo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you can add a short sentence in this PR description as to why it is preferable to have the token in the body rather than the header it would be 💯

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ FROM gcr.io/kaggle-images/python-tensorflow-whl:1.12.0-py36 as tensorflow_whl
FROM continuumio/anaconda3:5.2.0

ADD clean-layer.sh /tmp/clean-layer.sh
ADD patches/ /tmp/patches/
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@ifigotin ifigotin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thx!

@vimota vimota merged commit e65f73e into master Feb 21, 2019
@vimota vimota deleted the user_secrets branch February 28, 2019 02:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants