Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New version: Polynomials v1.1.11 #24108

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2020

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: f27b6e38-b328-58d1-80ce-0feddd5e7a45
Repo: https://github.com/JuliaMath/Polynomials.jl.git
Tree: fc6db0a5d8689af73a139303ab956e418a11e116

Registrator tree SHA: e934b8c55381f28735124f23e8f7e96d09b20416
JuliaRegistrator referenced this pull request in JuliaMath/Polynomials.jl Nov 3, 2020
Use `ntuple` instead of `NTuple` for constructing the coefficient tuples
passed to `evalpoly`. This compiles much faster on Julia 1.0 (especially
for high-degree polynomials) and is also faster to evaluate even on
current Julia.
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2020

Your new version pull request met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged in the next round.


If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot merged commit c2e8dba into master Nov 3, 2020
@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot deleted the registrator/polynomials/f27b6e38/v1.1.11 branch November 3, 2020 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants