Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFQ Add LikelihoodDensity as a typedef for existing implicit likelihood functionality #14

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

oschulz
Copy link
Collaborator

@oschulz oschulz commented May 24, 2022

I was looking for a place to define generic likelihood densities and realised that they already exist in DensityInterface in an implicit fashion. This makes them visible and documents them.

CC @devmotion , @cscherrer

@oschulz oschulz force-pushed the likelihood_density branch 2 times, most recently from 63c68eb to 3c076e5 Compare May 24, 2022 21:22
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 24, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #14 (d114d99) into master (e71eb2d) will decrease coverage by 10.29%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##            master      #14       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage   100.00%   89.70%   -10.30%     
============================================
  Files            2        2               
  Lines           59       68        +9     
============================================
+ Hits            59       61        +2     
- Misses           0        7        +7     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/interface.jl 86.53% <0.00%> (-13.47%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e71eb2d...d114d99. Read the comment docs.

@oschulz oschulz changed the title Add LikelihoodDensity as a typedef for existing implicit likelihood functionality RFQ Add LikelihoodDensity as a typedef for existing implicit likelihood functionality Jun 13, 2022
@oschulz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oschulz commented Jun 13, 2022

Let's put a pin in this for a bit maybe, this maybe be better off in another package.

@oschulz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oschulz commented Jun 1, 2023

MeasureBase.Likelihood can fill this role.

@oschulz oschulz closed this Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant