Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ambiguous: fix a rare case of comparison #48196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

vtjnash
Copy link
Sponsor Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Jan 9, 2023

This used to do the opposite test of what should have been required here
(it checked if it was ambiguous, rather than if it was sortable). This
now better aligns with the implementation in gf.c for the similar fast
path check during ml_matches.

@vtjnash vtjnash force-pushed the jn/isambiguous-better branch 2 times, most recently from 72b73a4 to 3cb01b0 Compare January 9, 2023 18:00
This used to do the opposite test of what should have been required here
(it checked if it was ambiguous, rather than if it was sortable). This
now better aligns with the implementation in gf.c for the similar fast
path check during ml_matches.
@vtjnash vtjnash merged commit 5ede942 into master Jan 10, 2023
@vtjnash vtjnash deleted the jn/isambiguous-better branch January 10, 2023 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant