Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update SparseArrays dependency #46790

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2022
Merged

Update SparseArrays dependency #46790

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2022

Conversation

fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

@fredrikekre fredrikekre commented Sep 16, 2022

This patch updates SparseArrays. In particular it contains JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#260 which is necessary to make progress in #46759.

All changes:

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

Shouldn't we be using BumpStdlibs for this?

@ViralBShah ViralBShah added the sparse Sparse arrays label Sep 18, 2022
This patch updates SparseArrays. In particular it contains
JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#260 which is
necessary to make progress in #46759.

All changes:
 - Fix ambiguities with Base. (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#268)
 - add == for vectors (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#248)
 - add undef initializers (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#263)
 - Make sure reductions benefit from sparsity (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#244)
 - Remove fkeep! from the documentation (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#261)
 - Fix direction of circshift (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#260)
 - Fix `vcat` of sparse vectors with numbers (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#253)
 - decrement should always return a vector (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#241)
 - change order of arguments in fkeep, fix bug with fixed elements (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#240)
 - Sparse matrix/vectors with fixed sparsity pattern. (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#201)
@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member Author

fredrikekre commented Sep 23, 2022

Didn't think it mattered, and I already had this patch locally.

@fredrikekre fredrikekre merged commit 6fdcfd4 into master Sep 27, 2022
@fredrikekre fredrikekre deleted the fe/sparseup branch September 27, 2022 08:37
vtjnash referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2022
If they are encountered in a Julia object directly, as opposed to
e.g. during serialization of a method instance, we'll have first
populated the backref table as part of jl_serialize_value, so we
need to skip that check during code instance serialization.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sparse Sparse arrays
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants