FIx misleading addprocs documentation
#10459
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I'm not 100% sure of this change, but my experimentation seems to indicate that this more accurately reflects `addprocs`'s behavior.
mbauman
added
domain:docs
|
Thanks @mweastwood . |
amitmurthy
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2015
FIx misleading `addprocs` documentation
|
Just curious - how did the 64-bit linux and osx tests pass with this typo? |
|
Because travis does a fetch of the PR merge commit when the build starts, those builds started after the fix was pushed to master, the failed build started before |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not 100% sure of this change, but my experimentation seems to indicate that this more accurately reflects
addprocs's behavior.