Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fancy indexing broken with SMatrix indices #141

Closed
c42f opened this issue Apr 14, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Fancy indexing broken with SMatrix indices #141

c42f opened this issue Apr 14, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@c42f
Copy link
Member

c42f commented Apr 14, 2017

I came across this while testing #139:

julia> [1,2,3,4][[1 2; 3 4]]
2×2 Array{Int64,2}:
 1  2
 3  4

julia> @SVector([1,2,3,4])[@SMatrix([1 2; 3 4])]
4-element StaticArrays.SArray{Tuple{4},Int64,1,4}:
 1
 3
 2
 4
@andyferris
Copy link
Member

Hmm... bugger. I thought this was working at some point...

andyferris pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2017
Restore fancy APL indexing
693e73b 
Was accidentally overiden for single argument case, assuming a kind of
a non-scalar linear indexing.

Fixes #141
@andyferris andyferris mentioned this issue Apr 25, 2017
Merged
@c42f c42f closed this as completed in #148 Apr 25, 2017
oschulz pushed a commit to oschulz/StaticArrays.jl that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2023
Do recursive bit during code generation in foreachfield (JuliaArrays#141
b1f814e 
)

* do recursive bit inside foreachfield codegen

* minor cleanup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@c42f @andyferris