-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why does RCP1.9 always fail to be solved in SSP2? #242
Comments
There are periods that model can't solve. |
Merge in JGCRI/gcam-core from siddarth/feature/detailed-industry-byu to sha/feature/detailed-industry-byu * commit '1fcde8304cfafb83a3ce5d78a5fe4501273a9da1': Add wind_offshore backup cost Change industry supply sector names in GCAM-USA Remove Commented Code
I wonder if you have solved this problem? |
Hi @wangyingying1227, @Vapson, which model periods are not solving? In SSP/SPA2, carbon pricing does not begin until 2040, which would likely make it infeasible to then return to 1.9 W/m2 under SSP2 technology and GDP growth assumptions which in turn inform constraints on negative emissions deployment. This was our finding for a SSP2-1.9 scenario without direct air capture available from our recent paper (in the supplementary information): https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2db0/meta |
Hello, I have a question. Why does RCP1.9 always fail to be solved in SSP2? Increasing the number of model iterations and lowering the model accuracy have been tried
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: