This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Store the information about particles distribution after gold standard #1172
Comments
I'll assign this to @josuegbl, he can better check this than me. |
@1aviervargas, did you submitted the proposed changes? I think you should add _rln before the name of the label, cause this label is specific to Relion. Maybe you can consider split your set into two subsets randomly in your protocol, instead storing a relion label. |
Hi @josuegbl <https://github.com/josuegbl> I did in my branch but not
merged with debel yet. Should I merge only this change? In addition, the
problem I see with what you suggested is that if any other protocol wants
to expose this information this label is not adequate. I agree that maybe
is better to add the label _rlnHalfId now and then think if we include this
information in Scipion model after, agree?
…On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Josué Gómez Blanco < ***@***.***> wrote:
@1aviervargas <https://github.com/1aviervargas>, did you submitted the
proposed changes? I think you should add _rln before the name of the label,
cause this label is specific to Relion. Maybe you can consider split your
set into two subsets randomly in your protocol, instead storing a relion
label.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1172 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALs-YZMFE_tGiGEzwUmMOPNVaa9XZ0q8ks5sZATygaJpZM4O0Aem>
.
|
While relion stores the half id, afaik cryosparc does the split randomly, so I'm not sure how to go with this between plugins |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi there,
I am working on the enrich method. After discussion with Coss and JM we decided to use gold standard somehow to show we have not model bias problems. The point is that I need the information about how particles are distributed between the two halves after autorefine. In Scipion this information is not stored. I have edited relion import to incorporate this information (tested) and also the relion refine protocol (not tested yet); @delarosatrevin and @pconesa, can you take a look to check that this takes sense? The branch is jv_hetero_enrich
The edited files are
relion/convert.py
relion/protocol_refine3D.oy
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: