Minitest

[HazelGrant]

Would you welcome a pull request that makes it so that this can run with Minitest? It sounds more fun to me to try and get that working than to spend days and days figuring out how to make my test suite run faster. :)

[CoralineAda]

That would be awesome! Let me know if I can help in any way.

On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Wendy [email protected] wrote:

Would you welcome a pull request that makes it so that this can run with Minitest? It sounds more fun to me to try and get that working than to spend days and days figuring out how to make my test suite run faster. :)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #1.

[HazelGrant]

Thanks! I've been doing some research. I was wondering if you could point me to any good examples of gems that allow for integration with either Rspec or Minitest? I'd like to see how other people have handled it.

[HazelGrant]

Hi Coraline,

I've been working on this for a few days and have finally come up with what I think is a viable solution. However, I've run up against a wall and don't know what I'm missing (I'm not really sure how to test what I'm doing except by pulling my changes into my own application and running the test suite to see if it works). I feel like it might be something really obvious such as missing a require or include somewhere. I was wondering if you could spare a few minutes to review my changes and see if there's anything you notice.

What I've done is hook into Minitest::Spec#after, which accepts a block, and I've used the #passed? method from Minitest::Test to determine the flag for #player. (Minitest::Spec inherits from Minitest::Test, so I shouldn't need to require it, right?).

If you could point out anything I've missed or help me figure out how to test this better and produce helpful errors, I would really appreciate it. The idea of trying to generate a fake test suite to run this against is kind of mind-boggling.

Here is the link to the current diff between your work and mine.

[CoralineAda]

Hi Wendy,

I have a party tonight but can definitely look at this tomorrow. Thanks for all the great work!

—Coraline

On Feb 28, 2015, at 3:47 PM, Wendy [email protected] wrote:

Hi Coraline,

I've been working on this for a few days and have finally come up with what I think is a viable solution. However, I've run up against a wall and don't know what I'm missing (I'm not really sure how to test what I'm doing except by pulling my changes into my own application and running the test suite to see if it works). I feel like it might be something really obvious such as missing a require or include somewhere. I was wondering if you could spare a few minutes to review my changes and see if there's anything you notice.

What I've done is hook into Minitest::Spec#after, which accepts a block, and I've used the #passed? method from Minitest::Test (which Minitest::Spec inherits from, so I shouldn't need to require it, right?).

If you could point out anything I've missed or help me figure out how to test this better and produce helpful errors, I would really appreciate it. The idea of trying to generate a fake test suite to run this against is kind of mind-boggling.

Here master...WendyBeth:minitest-integration is the link to the current diff between your work and mine.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #1 (comment).

[CoralineAda]

Hi Wendy,

I’m lining up someone who is more familiar with minitest than me to help you out if that’s okay with you?

Let me know…

Thank!
Coraline

On Feb 26, 2015, at 12:48 AM, Wendy [email protected] wrote:

Thanks! I've been doing some research. I was wondering if you could point me to any good examples of gems that allow for integration with either Rspec or Minitest? I'd like to see how other people have handled it.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #1 (comment).

[HazelGrant]

That's great. Thanks for doing that!

[CoralineAda]

Can you email me at [email protected] mailto:[email protected]? I’ll introduce you to Carol and then you two can pair on this. :)

Best,
Coraline

On Mar 3, 2015, at 1:07 AM, Wendy [email protected] wrote:

That's great. Thanks for doing that!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #1 (comment).