Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BB2-1222] Bump Django to 2.2.28 to Mediate CVE-2022-28346 and CVE-2022-28347 #1019

Merged

Conversation

JFU-GIT
Copy link
Contributor

@JFU-GIT JFU-GIT commented Apr 12, 2022

JIRA Ticket:
BB2-1222

User Story or Bug Summary:

Summary:

This resolves a vulnerability alert from Snyk this morning.

INFO:

How to fix?
Upgrade Django to version 2.2.28, 3.2.13, 4.0.4 or higher.

Overview
Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to SQL Injection via QuerySet.explain(**options) in option names, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **options argument on PostgreSQL.

What Does This PR Do?

What Should Reviewers Watch For?

If you're reviewing this PR, please check these things, in particular:

  • TODO

What Security Implications Does This PR Have?

Submitters should complete the following questionnaire:

  • If the answer to any of the questions below is Yes, then here's a link to the associated Security Impact Assessment (SIA), security checklist, or other similar document in Confluence: N/A.
    • Does this PR add any new software dependencies? No.
    • Does this PR modify or invalidate any of our security controls? No.
    • Does this PR store or transmit data that was not stored or transmitted before? No.
  • If the answer to any of the questions below is Yes, then please add StewGoin as a reviewer, and note that this PR should not be merged unless/until he also approves it.
    • Do you think this PR requires additional review of its security implications for other reasons? No.

What Needs to Be Merged and Deployed Before this PR?

This PR cannot be either merged or deployed until the following pre-requisite changes have been fully deployed:

  • CMSgov/some_repo#42

Any Migrations?

  • Yes, there are migrations
    • The migrations should be run PRIOR to the code being deployed
    • The migrations should be run AFTER the code is deployed
    • There is a more complicated migration plan (downtime, etc)
  • No migrations

Submitter Checklist

I have gone through and verified that...:

  • This PR is reasonably limited in scope, to help ensure that:
    1. It doesn't unnecessarily tie a bunch of disparate features, fixes, refactorings, etc. together.
    2. There isn't too much of a burden on reviewers.
    3. Any problems it causes have a small "blast radius".
    4. It'll be easier to rollback if that becomes necessary.
  • I have named this PR and its branch such that they'll be automatically be linked to the (most) relevant Jira issue, per: https://confluence.atlassian.com/adminjiracloud/integrating-with-development-tools-776636216.html.
  • This PR includes any required documentation changes, including README updates and changelog / release notes entries.
  • All new and modified code is appropriately commented, such that the what and why of its design would be reasonably clear to engineers, preferably ones unfamiliar with the project.
  • All tech debt and/or shortcomings introduced by this PR are detailed in TODO and/or FIXME comments, which include a JIRA ticket ID for any items that require urgent attention.
  • Reviews are requested from both:
    • At least two other engineers on this project, at least one of whom is a senior engineer or owns the relevant component(s) here.
    • Any relevant engineers on other projects (e.g. BFD, SLS, etc.).
  • Any deviations from the other policies in the DASG Engineering Standards are specifically called out in this PR, above.
    • Please review the standards every few months to ensure you're familiar with them.

Copy link
Contributor

@oragame oragame left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks James for putting this up so quick!

Copy link
Contributor

@dtisza1 dtisza1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me!

@JFU-GIT JFU-GIT merged commit 926ba83 into master Apr 12, 2022
@JFU-GIT JFU-GIT deleted the jfuqian/BB2-Bump-Django-version-from-2.2.27-to-2.2.28 branch April 12, 2022 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants