Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More precise list of resources #1060

Closed
vhorne opened this issue Dec 2, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

More precise list of resources #1060

vhorne opened this issue Dec 2, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request investigate

Comments

@vhorne
Copy link
Contributor

vhorne commented Dec 2, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When I define a new resource, I get a really long list of resources that aren't at all related to what I'm looking for.
Describe the solution you'd like
When I begin typing "Microsoft.Net" for a Microsoft.Networking resource, I'd like to see a list of resources that match what I'm typing. So everything that begins with "Microsoft.Net", NOT a list of everything that has "Microsoft" in it and "Net" somewhere in the string.

image

@miqm
Copy link
Collaborator

miqm commented Dec 12, 2020

👍🏻 In addition I'd add separation of resources and api versions - first you select Resource type, then in new hint window - it's api.

@majastrz
Copy link
Member

It should be possible to support segmented completions.

I suspect that some users will prefer the current behavior and others will want a more precise experience where it only searches through the segment you have typed. I think this one will have to be a setting on the VS code extension that gets passed to the language server.

@majastrz
Copy link
Member

We implemented segmented completions long ago.

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 29, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request investigate
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants