[Win] Fix composition on focus change #15907
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…sition on kill focus
Gillibald
added
backport-candidate-11.0.x
|
You can test this PR using the following package version. |
maxkatz6
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2024
grokys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
…sition on kill focus (#15907)
grokys
added
backported-11.0.x
and removed
backport-candidate-11.0.x
grokys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2024
…sition on kill focus (#15907)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does the pull request do?
This PR makes sure the current composition is reaching the active text input method client when the focus changes.
Previously the kill focus message was handled before the composition was finished and therefore the current composition was lost.
What is the current behavior?
What is the updated/expected behavior with this PR?
How was the solution implemented (if it's not obvious)?
Checklist
Breaking changes
Obsoletions / Deprecations
Fixed issues