-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature]: expose running evaluators via API to playground #1956
Merged
bekossy
merged 65 commits into
AGE-587/-implement-evaluation-main-page
from
feature/age-491-poc-1e-expose-running-evaluators-via-api-to-playground
Aug 30, 2024
Merged
[Feature]: expose running evaluators via API to playground #1956
bekossy
merged 65 commits into
AGE-587/-implement-evaluation-main-page
from
feature/age-491-poc-1e-expose-running-evaluators-via-api-to-playground
Aug 30, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
aybruhm
changed the title
Feature/age 491 poc 1e expose running evaluators via api to playground
[Feature][DRAFT]: expose running evaluators via API to playground
Aug 1, 2024
aybruhm
changed the title
[Feature][DRAFT]: expose running evaluators via API to playground
[Feature]: expose running evaluators via API to playground
Aug 2, 2024
…evaluator interface and modified endpoint to evaluate llm app run
jp-agenta
reviewed
Aug 9, 2024
jp-agenta
reviewed
Aug 9, 2024
jp-agenta
reviewed
Aug 9, 2024
jp-agenta
reviewed
Aug 9, 2024
…ors-via-api-to-playground
- Removed `requires_llm_api_keys` from evaluators that don't require LLM API keys - Ensured evaluators requiring LLM keys have `requires_llm_api_keys` set to `True` by default
…es to EvaluatorInputInterface
…loat for ai critique evaluator
…hen-we-send-a-dict-to-a-str-only
…il-gracefully-when-we-send-a-dict-to-a-str-only [Enhancement]: Handle non-string outputs gracefully in auto_contains_json evaluator
…i-to-playground' into feature/age-532-poc-1e-add-llm-api-key-checks-in-llm-based-evaluators
…m-api-key-checks-in-llm-based-evaluators [Enhancement] Add LLM API key checks to LLM-based evaluators
bekossy
changed the base branch from
main
to
AGE-587/-implement-evaluation-main-page
August 30, 2024 15:39
bekossy
merged commit Aug 30, 2024
f563103
into
AGE-587/-implement-evaluation-main-page
6 checks passed
bekossy
deleted the
feature/age-491-poc-1e-expose-running-evaluators-via-api-to-playground
branch
August 30, 2024 15:39
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR exposes the ability to run evaluators via an API.
Evaluators that have been tested
The following evaluators have been tested by the backend tests (and from the UI):
The following evaluators have only been tested from the UI:
What to QA
The QA process should involve running the evaluators mentioned above from the UI.
Related Issue
Closes AGE-491