[Snyk] Security upgrade tensorflow/tensorflow from latest to 2.16.1

[AdamOswald]

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Changes included in this PR

• Dockerfile.cpu

We recommend upgrading to tensorflow/tensorflow:2.16.1, as this image has only 40 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Some of the most important vulnerabilities in your base image include:

Severity	Priority Score / 1000	Issue	Exploit Maturity
	514	Memory Leak SNYK-UBUNTU2204-BINUTILS-5855103	No Known Exploit
	514	Information Exposure SNYK-UBUNTU2204-GNUTLS28-6172197	No Known Exploit
	514	Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature SNYK-UBUNTU2204-GNUTLS28-6172710	No Known Exploit
	514	NULL Pointer Dereference SNYK-UBUNTU2204-PYTHONCRYPTOGRAPHY-6097842	No Known Exploit
	514	Information Exposure SNYK-UBUNTU2204-PYTHONCRYPTOGRAPHY-6126749	No Known Exploit

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Memory Leak
🦉 NULL Pointer Dereference

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated TensorFlow to version 2.16.1 in the Dockerfile to ensure compatibility.
  • Added a comment in the Dockerfile to disable prompts for input during setup.

[aviator-app]

Current Aviator status

Aviator will automatically update this comment as the status of the PR changes.
Comment /aviator refresh to force Aviator to re-examine your PR (or learn about other /aviator commands).

This pull request is currently open (not queued).

How to merge

To merge this PR, comment /aviator merge or add the mergequeue label.

---

See the real-time status of this PR on the Aviator webapp.

Use the Aviator Chrome Extension to see the status of your PR within GitHub.

[secure-code-warrior-for-github]

Micro-Learning Topic: Information disclosure (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Information Exposure"

Many web applications and APIs do not properly protect sensitive data, such as financial, healthcare, and PII. Attackers may steal or modify such weakly protected data to conduct credit card fraud, identity theft, or other crimes. Sensitive data may be compromised without extra protection, such as encryption at rest or in transit, and requires special precautions when exchanged with the browser. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Top_Ten_Project

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 2 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -1
Percentile : 0.8%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.cpu : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The Dockerfile update signifies a cautious approach towards TensorFlow version selection, opting for 2.16.1 over the latest, possibly for stability or compatibility reasons. Additionally, it introduces a method to streamline the setup process by minimizing user interaction, enhancing the automation of Docker container deployment.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
Dockerfile.cpu	Updated TensorFlow to 2.16.1; added comment on disabling input prompts

Related issues

• tensorflow-2.11.0-cp37-cp37m-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl: 19 vulnerabilities (highest severity is: 9.8) #181: This PR's choice of TensorFlow version (2.16.1) suggests it addresses security concerns similar to those mentioned, by not using the vulnerable 2.11.0 version. However, without specifics on the vulnerabilities fixed in 2.16.1, direct linkage is speculative.

🐇 A whimsical note from a coding hare,
With TensorFlow updates, we show that we care.
No prompts to delay, no time to despair,
In Docker containers, our code we prepare.
🚀 To the future, we leap, with nary a snare,
With security in mind, a much safer affair.
Let's hop to it, with flair beyond compare!

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[performance-testing-bot]

Unable to verify url with installation ID

[difflens]

View changes in DiffLens

[senior-dev-bot]

Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. 🎉 To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization AdamOswald. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. 🚀

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[difflens]

View changes in DiffLens

[guide-bot]

Thanks for opening this Pull Request!
We need you to:

1. Fill out the description.

   Action: Edit description and replace <!- ... --> with actual values.

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. All of the files appear to be ones we're not sure how to review. We're working on it!

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8cddd9f and 6a89429.

Files selected for processing (1)

• Dockerfile.cpu (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 4

Dockerfile.cpu (4)

• 1-1: The update to TensorFlow version 2.16.1 is a positive change for enhancing security by addressing known vulnerabilities. Good choice!
• 3-3: Setting ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND noninteractive is a good practice to disable interactive prompts during the build process. Well done!
• 1-4: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [5-11]

The package management steps are well-structured, ensuring a clean and efficient build. However, ensure that the addition of the jonathonf/ffmpeg-4 PPA is necessary and aligns with the project's requirements.

• 1-4: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [12-14]

The Python package installation and cleanup process is well-handled, contributing to a clean and efficient Docker image. Nicely done!