Jump to content

Withering away of the state

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Withering away of the state is a Marxist concept coined by Friedrich Engels referring to the idea that, with the realization of socialism, the state will eventually become obsolete and cease to exist as society will be able to govern itself without the state and its coercive enforcement of the law.

Origin of the phrase

[edit]

The phrase stems from Friedrich Engels,[1] who wrote in part 3, chapter 2 of Anti-Dühring (1878):

The interference of the state power in social relations becomes superfluous in one sphere after another, and then ceases of itself. The government of persons is replaced by the administration of things and the direction of the processes of production. The state is not "abolished", it withers away. (German: Der Staat wird nicht „abgeschafft“, er stirbt ab., lit.'The state is not "abolished", it atrophies.')[2]

A related quote from Engels comes from Origins of the Family, Private Property, and the State (1884):

The society which organizes production anew on the basis of free and equal association of the producers will put the whole state machinery where it will then belong—into the museum of antiquities, next to the spinning wheel and the bronze axe.[1]

Interpretations

[edit]

Some trace the concept of the state withering away back to the early Karl Marx of the 1840s and to the socialist anarchist theorist Proudhon (1809-1865).[3] However, Marx's advocacy for the dictatorship of the proletariat and Proudhon's antagonism towards the state[4] proved uncomfortable bedfellows,[5] and the two thinkers parted company c. 1847. Proudhon's ideas on withering influenced the Paris Commune of 1871.[6][7]

Vladimir Lenin who later expanded on the idea

Although Engels first introduced the terminology of "the withering away of the state", he attributed the underlying concept to Marx, and other Marxist theorists—including Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924)—would later expand on it.[1] According to this concept of the withering away of the state, eventually a communist society will no longer require coercion to induce individuals to behave in a way that benefits the entire society.[1][2] Such a society would occur after a temporary period of the dictatorship of the proletariat.[2]

The idea of the communist society proceeds from the concept of the transformation of the state in a previous stage of society called socialism. Engels posits that—similar to the arguments made by Henri de Saint-Simon before him—in a socialist society public organization would become primarily concerned with technical issues such as the optimal allocation of resources and determination of production as opposed to drafting and enforcing laws and thus the traditional state functions would gradually become irrelevant and unnecessary for the functioning of society. Engels argued that the state transforms itself from a "government of people" to an "administration of things" and thus would not be a state in the traditional sense of the term.

This scenario depended on Marx's view of coercive power as a tool of those who own the means of production, i.e. certain social classes (the bourgeoisie) and the capitalist state.[2][1] In a communist society, the social classes would disappear and the means of production would have no single owner, hence such a stateless society will no longer require law and a stateless communist society will develop.[1][2][8]

The concept of the withering away of the state differentiates traditional Marxism from state socialism (which accepts the retention of the institution of the state) and anti-statist anarchism (which demands the immediate abolition of the state with no perceived need for any "temporary" post-revolutionary institution of the state).[2]

In the Soviet Marxism of the Soviet Union, Lenin supported the idea of the withering away of the state as seen in his The State and Revolution (1917). Joseph Stalin's government mentioned it occasionally, but did not believe the world was yet in the advanced stage of development where the state could wither away. He believed that at least in the short term the state had to have enough power to strike back against those elements seeking to derail the ultimate victory of communism. The Stalin-era Soviet Union marginalized the notion of the withering of the state, as the state became more powerful and entrenched.[2][9]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f Scrutton, Roger, ed. (2007). "Withering away of the state". Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Political Thought (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 736. ISBN 9781849724784. OCLC 857590425.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Kurian, George Thomas, ed. (2011). "Withering Away of the State". The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Washington, DC: CQ Press. p. 1776. doi:10.4135/9781608712434.n1646. ISBN 9781933116440. S2CID 221178956.
  3. ^ Horvat, Branko (1975). "A New Social System in the Making: Historical Origins and Development of Self-governing Socialism". In Horvat, Branko; Marković, Mihailo; Supek, Rudi; Kramer, Helen (eds.). Self-governing Socialism: Historical development. Self-governing Socialism: A Reader, Volume 1. White Plains, New York: International Arts and Sciences Press. p. 14. ISBN 9780873320504. Retrieved 7 September 2024. At first, Marx and Proudhon were friends. They held in common certain fundamental ideas such as the withering away of the state, the elimination of unearned incomes and exploitation, the disappearance of money, and the creation of a classless society.
  4. ^ Ritter, Alan (8 December 2015) [1969]. "Proudhon as a Radical Critic of Established Institutions". Political Thought of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Princeton Legacy Library (reprint ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 94. ISBN 9781400878567. Retrieved 7 September 2024. Proudhon wants to grab by the root what he regards as the present world's most potent instruments of oppression: hierarchy and government.
  5. ^ Ansart, Pierre (26 September 2023) [1967]. Jamil, Cayce (ed.). Proudhon's Sociology. Translated by Murdock, Shaun; Berthier, René; Cohn, Jesse S. AK Press. ISBN 9781849355209. Retrieved 7 September 2024. The notion [...] of the dictatorship of the proletariat [...] was undoubtedly formulated by Marx only cautiously: it can only be defined in relation to its dialectical negation, which would be the withering away of the state.
  6. ^ Tombs, Robert (11 June 2014) [1999]. "'The Political Form At Last Discovered?': The Commune as Government". The Paris Commune 1871. Turning Points. Abingdon: Routledge. p. 76. ISBN 9781317883852. Retrieved 7 September 2024. [...] there was a Proudhonist aspiration to unleash a revolution from below, in which initiative would remain with the people and central power wither away.
  7. ^ Tombs, Robert (11 June 2014) [1999]. "Consequences, Representations and Meanings". The Paris Commune 1871. Turning Points. Abingdon: Routledge. p. 200. ISBN 9781317883852. Retrieved 7 September 2024. The Commune, wrote Lenin, had demonstrated how 'the state begins to wither away' as bureaucracy is destroyed and power seized by the people.
  8. ^ Jianmin Zhao; Bruce J. Dickson (2001). Remaking the Chinese State: Strategies, Society, and Security. Taylor & Francis Group. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-415-25583-7. Retrieved 26 December 2012.
  9. ^ Stalinism at the Encyclopædia Britannica

Further reading

[edit]