Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeroption
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Zeroption (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, ephemeral, local band. Quasi-orphan page. — JFG talk 16:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Band lacks notability and coverage in independent reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 16:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I have found nothing better at all, there's simply nothing else actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 07:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.