Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zav foundation
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence or argument presented for notability j⚛e deckertalk 02:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Zav foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced page about a non-notable subject (only 1780 g-hits for "zav foundation" most of which seem to be social networking) that reads almost like an advert. CSD tags were removed so I am bringing it here. Sfgiants1995 (talk) 00:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per reasons stated above. It's not notable enough for an article, and reads exactly like an advertisement rather than an encyclopedia article. --RM (Be my friend) 01:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - The article must be speedily deleted. The article is neither referenced nor written in an encyclopedic manner. The article do not meet WP:ORG. Amartyabag TALK2ME 03:48, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - No indication of notability and the article qualifies for speedy deletion under CSD A7 already. Holyfield1998 (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not adequately notable NGO for an article. Arunram (talk) 07:25, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.