Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young-jae Jung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notability has been established. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 16:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Young-jae Jung

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing particularly convincing of any applicable notability and I have found only expected mentions at Books, News and Highbeam, nothing noticeably better to suggest better improvements. SwisterTwister talk 23:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough in-depth coverage. Tom29739 ^[talk] 20:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Delete I found a few sources dating 2008-2012, but in most of them, the subject was mentioned in passing (some of them were event listings). At this time I don't think there is enough coverage to support having a separate article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to keep. Thanks a lot for the Korean sources User:Explicit. I have now managed to reference the article. I agree that the subject is notable (currently a soloist and principal dancer) with Korea National Ballet. This source, although an opinion, seems to suggest that the subject is one of the top ballet dancers in South Korea. I guess we can keep it. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Jung has been subject to a plethora of coverage in Korean-language sources, some of which also mention his awards: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Clearly notable. — ξ ^xplicit 06:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.