Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TandMProductionCo (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- TandMProductionCo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILMS - non-notable films creator with no popular creations. Vacationnine 00:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Comment the earlier AfD was speedy closed & the article deleted for there being no claim of notability. It consisted merely of sections 2 and 3 of the present article, without the company history. This is an expanded version, & can therefore not be deleted as G4, even if the previous AfD counts as the necessary prior deletion discussion. DGG ( talk ) 00:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom + I am still yet to see a reliable source in this article on a supposed film company, as it's current state is WP:OR. It fails WP:CORP too. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 03:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per failing WP:CORP. Though changed from earlier version, this one still lacks any reliable sources... and none are available. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yep, per MST☆R, no reliable sources and reads more like an advert. Whitewater111 (talk) 07:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.