Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sipie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sipie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable, doesn't claim to be notable. No major edits in more than 18 months, orphaned except for template transclusions. contested PROD. Miami33139 (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of notability; lots of ghits but none in news. JJL (talk) 01:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. I love Sipie. Unfortunately no on knows about it. Therefore, it's not notable :-( -Gr0ff (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I wish people would stick to the point in deletion nominations. None of "No major edits in more than 18 months, orphaned except for template transclusions. contested PROD" is in any way evidence that this should be deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.