Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SadlerVision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:35, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SadlerVision

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has never had any references, and no updates since creation in 2008. I can't find any references to it on the internet except mirrors. I suspect this is either a non-notable homemade series or even a joke entry (similarity of the title to Children's BBC programme ChuckleVision and titles like "Christmas Day 2004" imply it might just be a collection of home videos. Bob talk 09:00, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 09:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 09:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Can't find a thing about it online, and if it's not a hoax then it's completely non-notable. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:49, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've tagged the article as a possible hoax since there is nothing online verifying its existence outside of Wikipedia mirrors, but this edit made by the original author soon after the article's creation makes me further suspect that this article is a joke by how it decribes the supposed main characters of this show (like how Tracy is "Seans Mam, Rachels Aunty. Is funny with her dog situations and when on holiday"). The original author soon removed the "main characters" section in favor of all of the non-descript episodes that suposedly aired on TV during the six seasons (and later seventh). I feel this is a long-lived hoax or joke that somehow managed to evade detection for this long. Eiether way, delete. 98.209.191.37 (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I can't find anything on this at all. -- Thanks, Alfie. ^{talk to me | contribs} 17:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.