Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reginleif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deletion per WP:G4. The same article was recently deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reginleif Trubetsky. This page has been restored to the original redirect. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 14:14, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reginleif

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think Reginleif Trubetsky passes WP:BIO - the sources in the article are not reliable as defined by WP:RS, and I couldn't find any other sources online. Trubetsky was a member of this notable band, but as a redirect I think Valkyrie would be more appropriate, because that is where the name comes from in the first place. I don't think this page should be deleted outright, but I am sending it to AfD because my redirection has been contested. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 13:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This should be at Reginleif Trubetsky. It was created by hijacking the Reginleif article, with this edit on 30 September]. There is a pre-existing disagreement over whether the article should redirect to Valkyrie or to a list of game characters; it was created to be about the game character. Clearly if this gets kept there needs to be a disambiguation page. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.