Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notes (application)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. There have been 1 delete, 2 merge and 4 keep votes while one of the merge votes were by an editor who made their second edit across the wiki here. There were no chances of relisting after 3 already and deletion is never going to be an outcome with this AfD since there exists no other deletion vote other than the nom. There had been no support for deletion other then the nomination and the last 4 votes suggest keeping the article. If anyone still feels that this should be merged, than a discussion on the talk page is all that is needed. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser TSU 01:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Notes (application) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I look forward to a discussion on whether this article relating to the iOS native Notes app is notable. As I believe, in itself, it is not as it is fairly standard. If this article is deemed notable, this would suggest other native apps such as the clock, calendar and calculator must also be notable, and I don't believe that is the case. -- Patchy1 03:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:56, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Would an article on native iPhone apps be notable? Ryan Vesey 03:55, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To be clear, I mean would having one article that discusses Notes, Clock, Calendar, etc. in one article be notable. Ryan Vesey 03:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe as a section of iOS. -- Patchy1 05:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To be clear, I mean would having one article that discusses Notes, Clock, Calendar, etc. in one article be notable. Ryan Vesey 03:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patchy1 02:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patchy1 01:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with iOS... Notes is just like every other app... I do not think that every app needs its own article Fer0015 (talk) 11:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to iOS. Maybe Passbook, which has received massive coverage from news agencies, would be notable. Notes is just another app though. Vacation9 17:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as one of the major apps on a notsble system., There are enough reviews to be found. DGG ( talk ) 18:56, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patchy1 01:14, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if more sources and content are able to be added. Videomaniac29 (talk) 04:00, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - part of a major system and essentially as notable as, say, Notepad is (OK, it's not anywhere near as well established, but it's essentially the iOS version of Notepad) - and no, I'm far from an Apple fanboy! Lukeno94 (talk) 10:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand - Part of OS and should be expanded to similar state of similar software. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:58, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.