Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunhippalli
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:34, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Kunhippalli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although article asserts notability, article cites no sources so does not meet WP:V or WP:RS ReformedArsenal (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Google News provided two results and Google Books also provided two results, all of which would minimal improvement. The two Google Books results appears to provide something interesting, "It is believed that his holy tomb is situated at the Kunhippalli mosque of Chombal" but the preview never clarifies who this is. Unfortunately, like most India-related topics, it's likely that any useful sources may not be English or Internet-based. SwisterTwister talk 20:13, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per SwisterTwister's comment. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 08:58, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This still does not make it meet WP:V and until it does it has no sources. ReformedArsenal (talk) 12:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP The above place is notable and is meritorious enough to be on wikipedia (Harishrawat11 (talk) 07:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 17:28, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go Phightins! 18:36, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.