Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KazAirJet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KazAirJet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is unsourced, thus failing notability Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:28, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Google News found one result that only mentions them once so it's probably minor, but Google News archives provided additional results (Two German links that never show the relevant content and two Russian). However, all of them simply appear to be listings, not anything substantial. It is certainly possible additional sources are either Kazakh or Russian. SwisterTwister talk 22:28, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBr and ley 18:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Clear lack of sources to prove notability. —Comp dude¹²³ 19:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a small private airline with no real notability whatsoever. Lukeno94 (talk) 10:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - being unsourced can be fixed, if the sources are out there, but a lack of significant coverage is the kiss-of-death per WP:GNG. I note that this is not an airline as such, but an air charter company operating business jets and helicopters. YSSYguy (talk) 06:54, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.