Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Tune
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:19, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Holy Tune (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sorry but this article is an advertisement. All the sources mentioned in the article have same text (slightly altered but line are very similar), all of sources are published at about the same time (in May & June). From the discussion we have here on bnwiki, we came to this conclusion that most likely Holy Tune itself provided the texts to the journalists/publishers/newspapers (self-promotion). Also most of the sources are primary, they directly quote from the owner of this record label (interview type, those aren't significant coverage). Fails WP:ORG, WP:GNG (We speedy deleted the article on bnwiki for above reason and others, see Afd there). আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete- The article reads like an advertisement and sources cited fail to establish notability.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Yeah this is basically an ad, and there seems to be little notability and wouldn't meet criteria for that. Tautomers (talk) 21:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Its look like an advertisement. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.