Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ho Chi Minh City Football Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Chi Minh City Football Cup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

blatantly fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. when you have U-17 teams competing you can guarantee no notability. LibStar (talk) 06:10, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 06:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 06:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I disagree that an U17 competition is immediately not notable; that said, I do agree that this is about as far from notable as you can get! I think you'll find it's *mostly* a U23 competition though. Lukeno94 (talk) 10:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I think that if any article has good sources that verifies its content, it's always going to be worthy of inclusion. After all, that is the whole point of notability. If enough sources exist outside of Wikipedia and are independent of the subject itself to verify and warrant an article bigger than a stub, it is obviously notable. Currently, this article is in a state where there are no references and the content is in proseline. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:34, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete Not a notable event. --Shorthate (talk) 18:09, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 09:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unsourced and with no indication of notability. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. — ΛΧΣ21™ 23:55, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.