Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Burgess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ethan Burgess

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. A google search, even including “figure skater” fails to find any reliable sources. Doesn’t appear he’s ever competed in the Olympics. Rockchalk7 17 02:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP 99% of all the best skaters in the world will never compete in an Olympics! Some world medalists have never competed in an Olympics. No way should the standard for figure skater on Wikipedia be appearence in an Olympics. You think Wikipedia would be good on figure skating if there was no entry for yukari nakano Alissa czisny etc? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty786 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerty786: And 99% of figure skaters don’t meet Wikipedia’s eligibility requirements. That’s the issue and question here. He has to fit Wikipedia’s nobility definition, which is at the very least meeting WP:GNG, which he does not.--Rockchalk7 17 21:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG; WP:NSPORT Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – doesn't seem to meet any of the WP:NSKATE criteria, and the largely trivial coverage isn't sufficient to pass the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.