User talk:Zarcadia
/Archive 1
/Archive 2
/Archive 3
Blond
[edit]Hi Zarcadia. I'm pretty sure people know where Maryland is. Well anyone here reading articles anyways. SlightSmile 23:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Slightsmile Maybe in the U.S. but outside probably/possibly not! Remember English-language Wikipedia is read by people in Britain, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa. States like California and Texas are universally known but Maryland is not. Zarcadia (talk) 01:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- I've always assumed people in Europe as well as Australia, NZ and most places pretty much know the American states and probably the provinces in Canada. Am I mistaken about that? SlightSmile 01:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Probably the 'famous' ones like California, New York (even that will cause confusion with NYC...), Alaska and Texas, may be known or recognizable to the non-US layman reader but the majority of the 50 states are not, I have an interest in geography and I could easily name more states than the average American high school student (I can name all 50) but I spend a lot of my time at work (working for a multinational) answering questions like "is Louisiana a city?" or "What state is Arizona in?" (I am the 'go to guy' for geography). Zarcadia (talk) 02:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- I'm surprised. I remember my father telling me there was a time people thought Japan was the capital of China but that was long ago. I knew a woman who never heard of WWII but she was from a less developed part of the world. Anyways it's good to meet you. SlightSmile 02:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Probably the 'famous' ones like California, New York (even that will cause confusion with NYC...), Alaska and Texas, may be known or recognizable to the non-US layman reader but the majority of the 50 states are not, I have an interest in geography and I could easily name more states than the average American high school student (I can name all 50) but I spend a lot of my time at work (working for a multinational) answering questions like "is Louisiana a city?" or "What state is Arizona in?" (I am the 'go to guy' for geography). Zarcadia (talk) 02:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- I've always assumed people in Europe as well as Australia, NZ and most places pretty much know the American states and probably the provinces in Canada. Am I mistaken about that? SlightSmile 01:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Zarcadia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Zarcadia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Separate the Magnets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The provided references don't demonstrate the notability of this album.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Zarcadia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
In case you are interested, a discussion for renaming is opened. 92.184.104.204 (talk) 09:22, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
[edit]Hello Zarcadia! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 04:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
[edit]Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,