User talk:NEDOCHAN

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Bold:Refine

Per this edsum [1], just thought you might like to read this essay: Wikipedia:Bold-refine. My second edit was a refinement and neither a reversion nor an implementation of consensus. Further refinements are welcome, of course. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Daniel in Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muslim conquests.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Homer’s Enemy

Your Last revision was bad. S'S are NOT necessary and Bart’s subplot takes the bottom. 108.162.28.226 (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It is a bit odd that you have come to my talk page for your second edit. I think you're probably a sockpuppet. That said, and making a big effort to AGF, here is the Manual of Style ref in question.

Singular nouns For the possessive of singular nouns, including proper names and words ending in s, add 's (my daughter's achievement, my niece's wedding, Cortez's men, the boss's office, Illinois's largest employer, the US's partners, Descartes's philosophy, Verreaux's eagle). Exception: abstract nouns ending with an /s/ sound when followed by sake (for goodness' sake, for his conscience' sake). If a name ending in s or z would be difficult to pronounce with 's added (Jesus's teachings), consider rewording (the teachings of Jesus).

NEDOCHAN (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NEDOCHAN, thank you. I learnt about nouns ending with "s" sound when followed by "sake" grammar above :). Have a good day. Cassiopeia talk 20:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one Cass - hope you're well. NEDOCHAN (talk) 08:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brabo is a gi-only choke

Hi mate, brabo chokes are exclusively possible in the gi as you are choking someone with the gi itself. It's impossible to brabo choke anyone in e.g. the UFC because they aren't wearing any clothing to choke with. What you're conflating it with is called a D'Arce choke. You can D'Arce people who are wearing the gi too so don't assume it's a brabo choke or D'Arce depending on gi-status. But you can certainly not brabo choke anyone in no-gi.

I'll fix this in the Chimaev article but if you've done these edits in any other fighter's pages please consider fixing them yourself.

Best regards, Stosseled (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The source for fighter records is at the bottom of the infobox. Thanks. NEDOCHAN (talk) 21:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]