User talk:EnemyOfTheState

Please help page Miracle (Paula Seling and Ovi song)

Hello, I saw that you help to add a audio sample for Lena Meyer song at Eurovision Satellite in 2010, please cand you put an audio sample for Paula and Ovi song in the infobox, to this page Miracle (Paula Seling and Ovi song).

Thanks a lot, I speak in the name of Paula manager, means a lot for us. Audio Sample for Miracle 2A02:2F0E:D2EF:FFFF:0:0:4F74:FFC3 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I told you that Angelina Jolie was pregnant but you kept deleting it. I told you that she was!

Hi

Hello I'm not sure if anyone has formaly Welcomed you yet so here goes

Angelina Jolie

Why did you remove that she was a fashion model? It is important to state what type of model a person was. In this case, Angelina was a fashion model. Lil Flip246 15:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox should only state her current (or recent) occupation and she hasn't been a fashion model for 15 years. All she does are occasional photo shoots or some modeling for advertising. Plus it is already mentioned in the very first sentence ("former fashing model"), so please stop adding that to her infobox. Also do not add information based on blogs or internet forums as per WP:RS and you have to use the existing citation style (WP:CITE); footnotes not embedded HTML links on Angelina Jolie. I reverted all your edits again, since they could easily be considered vandalism. You just cut off sentences for what you consider important information ("Before Jolie began a career as an actress, At the age of 14 she was a fashion model ..."). -- EnemyOfTheState 18:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Gyllenhaal FAC

Hello, since your vote to oppose on Jake Gyllenhaal's FAC, critical commentary has now been added. Would you mind relooking at the article and either reconsidering or providing more critical points? Thankyou. Dev920 15:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Angelina Jolie FAC

I am very disappointed to see that the FAC failed right in the middle of our discussion! And yet Jake Gyllenhaal is still listed! I truly do not understand how this process works sometimes. I think the Jolie article is very, very good. If you decide to renominate in the future, please let me know. I would be happy to support it now. If you renominate it too quickly, you'll have people crying "bad faith" at you, but if you leave it a while - let me know. Rossrs 02:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was pretty surprised to see the nomination closed after merely 5 days myself. The article certainly was on a very good way. I guess there is no point debating this, but the article has probably a good chance now, if it's renominated in a few weeks. -- EnemyOfTheState 10:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's an opportunity to further fine-tune, I guess. I'm mystified, but.... strange things happen. You don't seem discouraged, and I'm glad - quite often it's the luck of the draw as to who's looking at FAC at the time of a particular nomination. I'm going to be away for about 3 weeks, but I hope you'll remind me when it's nominated again. Rossrs 13:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks again for your contributions, including your very thorough copyedit. I will leave a note on your talk page, if I nominate the article again. -- EnemyOfTheState 14:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Congratulations! Nice to see that it was successful second time around. Rossrs 06:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - Again, thank you for your complete copy edit, it was much appreciated. Hopefully, the article remains featured for a while ... ;) -- EnemyOfTheState 20:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:JolieTattoo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JolieTattoo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JolieField.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:JolieField.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 17:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angelina Jolie

Please stop your current edit war on Angelina Jolie, otherwise it has to be considered vandalism. This article is a featured article, therefore has gone through a number of reviews and is considered on of the best on Wikipedia. Your current edits are not helping in any way and only diminish the quality of the article.

As I tried to point out to you several times now, the lead section should not be cut down, as WP:LEAD states that an article of that length should have a lead of three or four paragraphs. Also, including two different styles of citation and emphasizing quotes that would be interesting for tabloids is not a good idea. On top of that your formating is sloppy ("Brad Pitt ( while he is filming , in a relationship that has attracted worldwide media attention [4]") cutting off sentences, using wrong forms for citations (please see WP:Manual of Style and WP:CITE), removing wikilinks from dates which is against WP:DATE, and you still haven't familiarized yourself with Template:Infobox actor obviously, as you still insist to include a wrong format for the awards in the infobox.

I would ask you not to do major edits on this article unless you read the Wikipedia guidelines, at least discuss your edits on the talk page first. EnemyOfTheState 13:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC) I am not in war, just like the US should not be. Vandalsim according to who, you? You repeatedly rv othr ppl's edits, you do not own this wiki article. It is a collaboration. The lead does not have to be 3-4 paragraphs, it says this:[reply]

" It should be between one and four paragraphs long... ".

Her 1st role is not notable and so it goes in her career beginnings section. Her 1st 2 marriages are not significant. Tomb Raider and Mr/Mrs Smith are significant. The style manual says info is more important than formatting:

" While quality of writing may be more important than presentation and formatting...One of the joys of wiki editing is that Wikipedia does not demand perfection. "

But if you are hung up on it, fix it dont delete it. I double checked and put the year the ceremony was held and the year the movei was released, what is wrong about that? If you still see errors, correct them please. I did not emphasize a tabloid quote. Ann Curry of NBC is a respected journalist. I fixed the incomplete sentence. The citations have <r ef> </ ref>. You dont know what I am and am not familiar with. Lilkunta 16:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've locked the article until the current edit dispute is resolved. I've placed an invitation on Lilkunta's talk page asking him/her to discuss the issue on the AJ talk page, and just for the record I'm likewise inviting you to do likewise (though I know you've already stated your case there). 23skidoo 20:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JolieHackers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JolieHackers.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Quentin X 18:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please warn vandals after reverting their edits

Hello. I'm in agreement with the recent revert you made to Talk:Angelina Jolie. You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Beloved freak 11:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:JolieField.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JolieField.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ilse @ 15:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey there

Hi!

I've seen your contributions related to the Hollywood filmbios with interest. I wanted to request your guidance on something related.

I've put together a list of problems which I've found come up again and again in the H(B)ollywood filmbios and thrown em into one page - here's the link. Whenever you have time, could you have a look? I'd be grateful for your opinion on this.

Thank you for your time,xC | ☎ 13:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your inputs there! Much appreciated :)

One more request, I was planning to take that page to all the editors working on filmbios currently, which would involve posting to the relevant wikiprojects. Do you believe the page is presentable enough to request community input? If yes, then where all c(sh)ould I take it for further discussion?

Best regards,xC | ☎ 17:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angelina Jolie

Angelina Jolie father's ancestors come from Kosice, Slovakia! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sasalap (talk • contribs) 21:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jga.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jga.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree (talk) 06:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Knut (polar bear)

I have edited the article for tone as you have suggested.[1] Please take a look and see if it's satisfactory. Please understand that although the prose may still be a little heavy handed in places (the "popular" songs, for example), it is supported by the sources. If there is anything more, you can let me know or mention it on the talk page. Take care, María (habla conmigo) 18:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reese Witherspoon FAC

Hi. Regarding the comments you left at this FAC, I've fixed the page in accordance with your suggestions (and responded to a few things, too. Please check on my edits and the article again, and tell me what you think. Look forward to hearing more from you, it's really nice to have input from editors experienced in film actors FAs. :) PeaceNT (talk) 19:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changeling (2008)

As you point out, the correct title for this Straczynski-Eastwood-Jolie film is Changeling (2008). This is the title mentioned in the original Variety article (https://www.variety.com/article/VR1117960798.html?categoryid=13&cs=1) announcing the production and the Universal Pictures website (https://www.universalpictures.com/). However, there is another film mentioned in the IMDb with the title Changeling (2008) (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0462225/). Unfortunately, the IMDb and the Hollywood press have also referred to the Straczynski-Eastwood-Jolie film as the The Changeling. We need to keep this in mind when correcting the title to reduce confusion.--Dan Dassow (talk) 17:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow!

		Football (soccer) barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for this edit to Cristiane Rozeira de Souza Silva. Wow.. just.. Wow! Nanonic (talk) 18:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. It is edits like this on insignificant sports articles like this that gravely threaten Wikipedia's reputation as a serious source of information. Shame on you! 217.117.172.36 (talk) 09:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, EnemyOfTheState! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion

You recently made comments about this article on its talk page. ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. JMcC (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Succession box on Angelina Jolie

A couple days ago you removed the Awards succession box from the Jolie article. Your edit summary said there would be a comment on the talk page explaining this, but there doesn't seem to be anything there (maybe your edit wasn't saved?). Could you try posting it again? Thanks! 23skidoo (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to this section Talk:Angelina_Jolie#Some_suggestions - there seemed to be consent that succession boxes are rather redundant. EnemyOfTheState (talk) 14:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Susianna Kentikian

		Armenian Barnstar of National Merit
		User:EnemyOfTheState is hereby awarded the Armenian Barnstar of National Merit for all the hard work he has done to improve the coverage of Susianna Kentikian article and its promotion to GA status. Keep up the great work! VartanM (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
		_{this WikiAward was given to {{subst:PAGENAME}} by ~~~ on ~~~~~}

Angelina Jolie awards section citations

Hi! You cited as source an IMDb list of awards in the Awards section of Angelina Jolie. Please see this thread in Jolie discussion page. IMDb (probably) cannot be considered as reliable source in this regard. So, please provide relible sources there. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DFBWomen.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:DFBWomen.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit request: Germany women's national football team

Sure, give me a few days and I will take a look at it. – ukexpat (talk) 18:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have just completed a copy-edit of this article. My main changes were to tenses in some sections where in English the present perfect tense is more appropriate. One comment - the article uses a couple of different styles for tables, some with grid lines and visible and shaded backgrounds, whereas the "current squad" table uses no grid lines and no shading in the main part of the table. Perhaps the tables should all use the same format for internal consistency. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 20:39, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Germany women's national football team

I'm thinking that the article Germany women's national football team might be ready for FA status. I'm seeing what you think as an editor that worked on this article. --Pinkkeith (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to start the FA process until speaking with you first since I knew you were putting lots of time and work into the article. I'll go ahead and start it up then. --Pinkkeith (talk) 21:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DFBWomen.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DFBWomen.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for the hard work and quality editing put into the Susianna Kentikian article. Showtime2009 (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angelina & her awards

I am happy to see that you have incorporated some of her awards into the main filmography. Personally, I would love to see the rest of them have the same treatment. My own view of separate awards tables is that it puts a lot of emphasis on the awards outside of the context of the films, roles, etc. I, for one, would support the incorporation of the rest. Wildhartlivie (talk) 11:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All of the awards listed in the Awards section are already mentioned in the filmography. If you want to cut the awards table entirely, the discussion should probably be on article's talk page. EnemyOfTheState_|talk 11:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't presume to suggest major changes on a featured article, especially to the person who was responsible for making it that way. I didn't compare the remaining awards table with the filmography, but I thought perhaps you were moving to combine the two tables. However, since you've added the minor awards, and the major ones are there, the awards table is redundant to the infobox awards and the filmography table. I noticed you'd done away with the succession boxes, which I think is great thing, they are a lot of clutter and are mostly redundant in the majority of articles. This is your article and I respect that (recognizing that no one owns an article. :) Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:DSV logo.svg

Thanks for uploading File:DSV logo.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kirsten Dunst FAC

I've taken care of your concerns, regarding its FAC review. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Enemy, listen, I want to ask a favor, since you have been very helpful during Maggie Gyllenhaal and Kirsten Dunst's FAC's, I was wondering if you have time, in which you could comment on Brad Pitt's peer review. I do hope I could get the article to FA, but I would like some comments first before any time of nomination happens. If you have time, I would appreciate your comments a lot. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to look over the article and write concerns at the PR. I got your comments, responded to them, and will work on the ones I didn't get too, hopefully I got all your queries. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary injunction and your use of my monobook script

Hi,

I am pleased to see that you have used my monobook script to remove the autoformatting or linking of dates or other functions; I hope you have found it useful.

This is to let you know that ArbCom has announced a temporary injunction against the "mass delinking of dates". You can still delink dates on an occasional basis; however, you may wish to be cautious and use the script only for its non-date functions until the issue is resolved by an RFC poll. You may wish to express your view on autoformatting and date linking in the RFC at: Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll.

Regards Lightmouse (talk) 18:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Women's Euro 2009

On 11 September 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article UEFA Women's Euro 2009, which you nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Magdalena Neuner

Hallo EnemyOfTheState, ich musste leider das aktuelle Foto von Magdalena Neuner (Neuner1.jpg) auf Commons vor der Einbindung in den dt. Artikel duplizieren (Magdalena Neuner Vancouver 2010.jpg), weil es eine Namenskollision auf der dt. WP gibt (da ist ein Grab abgebildet, nicht so passend...). Es wäre nett, wenn Du die Referenz im engl. Artikel aktualisieren könntest, um die andere Datei zu löschen. Ich möchte das nicht selbst machen, um keine Irritation zu schaffen. --GraceKelly (talk) 20:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lena Meyer-Landrut

Hey there, I just wanted to say 'thanks' for the work on some of the articles on LML, especially for the big edit that improved Satellite a lot. Keep up the good work - the en articles on LML are already substantially better then the de ones. Janfrie1988 (talk) 00:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leider nein, nur die Downloads. Janfrie1988 (talk) 01:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wäre übrigens toll, wenn du hier noch bei "Other charted songs" Mr Curiosity eintragen könntest. Ich kommen mit den Boxen irgendwie noch nicht so ganz klar. Quelle Janfrie1988 (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lena Meyer-Landrut

I have removed the Gold certification for the single "Satellite as Bundesverband Musikindustrie has not yet issued a Gold certification for the song. Also, I have only left the No.9 position and removed the positions for "Bee" and "Love Me" as the provided source is not going to remain the following week the way it is this week, it needs to be replaced with a source which indicates peak positions not weekly based positions. And lastly, I am going to ask you not to revert edits without being able to provide sources for the stated claims. Let's bear in mind that Certification-awards as well as all chart positions must be verifiable; in other words, claiming in edit summary here that Bundesverband Musikindustrie falls behind in certifying records is not a reason enough to revert other editors' edits. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 23:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My Cassette Player

I have rearranged the names in the My Cassette Player personnell section. Do you think it looks better now? Feel free to make further improvements! Regards, Janfrie1988 (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Satellite-video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Satellite-video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube views in "Satellite" article

Hi there. As you are one of the contributors to the article I would be interested in your opinion if the youtube views should be kept or left out. There is a discussion going on here. Janfrie1988 (talk) 17:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flagged Protection

Hi again. I would be very interested in your opinion on Flagged Protection. I would also encourage you to voice it in the final poll that is going to be held about its final implementation/abolition. Cheers, Janfrie1988 (talk) 00:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WWC2011logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WWC2011logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WWC2011logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WWC2011logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Germany women's national football team

Hi there! I've just translated this article, that you helped reach FA status, to greek wikipedia (el:Εθνική Γερμανίας (ποδόσφαιρο γυναικών)). Thanks for your contributions, my regards. --94.65.106.187 (talk) 20:06, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Schuhelmets.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Schuhelmets.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Matthewedwards : Chat 15:46, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lena Meyer-Landrut - Satellite.ogg

Hi there- each usage of non-free content requires a separate, specific rationale outlining what the image adds to the article in question, preferably tying it into the article's text. As one of the articles is currently at GAC, it's doubly important to make sure that the non-free content usage is sound. If you have any questions, please ping me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Magdalena_Neuner

Any reason why this isn't featured? It seems good enough? Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page appearance: Angelina Jolie

This is a note to let the main editors of Angelina Jolie know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on June 19, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or one of his delegates (Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 19, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Angelina Jolie (born 1975) is an American actress, film director, and screenwriter. She has received an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress (for her performance in the 1999 drama Girl, Interrupted), two Screen Actors Guild Awards, and three Golden Globe Awards, and was named Hollywood's highest-paid actress by Forbes in 2009 and 2011. Jolie promotes humanitarian causes as a Special Envoy and former Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. She has often been cited as the world's "most beautiful" woman. Jolie made her screen debut as a child alongside her father Jon Voight in Lookin' to Get Out (1982). Her first leading role in a major film was in the cyber-thriller Hackers (1995). She achieved wide fame after her portrayal of video game heroine Lara Croft in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001), and received critical acclaim for her performances in the dramas A Mighty Heart (2007) and Changeling (2008). She made her directorial debut with the wartime drama In the Land of Blood and Honey (2011). Divorced from actors Jonny Lee Miller and Billy Bob Thornton, Jolie now lives with actor Brad Pitt, in a relationship notable for fervent media attention. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

strong women
Thank you for quality articles about single strong women, such as today's Angelina Jolie and Susianna Kentikian, and teams like the German women's national football team, and for seeing the "limit to the application of democratic methods", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 520th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years ago, you were recipient no. 520 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Million Award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Angelina Jolie (estimated annual readership: 6,217,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Angelina Jolie to Featured Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox biathlete

Template:Infobox biathlete has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox biathlete

Template:Infobox biathlete has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Satellite-Meyer-Landrut.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Satellite-Meyer-Landrut.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]