Talk:Merger guidelines

Questionable accuracy

This article talks only about the Reagan administration's effects on mergers and acquisitions law, but it says nothing about the actual content of the guidelines. While I am certainly not a Reaganite, I think this article should be fleshed out a bit to explain what the actual USDOJ/FTC merger guidelines actually are. --Eastlaw 07:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, here are some links which will serve as useful references for improving this article:

--Eastlaw 19:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Under construction

I have been rather busy of late, but I am slowly but surely building this article into something which will be relatively good. Please be patient while I add information. --Eastlaw 05:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy & paste from FTC

Apparently, User:Mr kc copied and pasted a bunch of information from the Federal Trade Commission webpage. This is not a copyright violation, because such information is public domain as a work of the U.S. government. It does, however, require cleanup. --Eastlaw (talk) 23:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed that, and instead moved the URL to the "External links" section, which I also took the opportunity to reorganize a bit. Please use the {{copypaste}} template with care. That template transcludes Category:Possible copyright violations, and causes the page to be reported there as a possible copyright violation to be investigated. -- TJRC (talk) 22:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other jurisdictions also have merger guidelines

This article is very focussed on the US. Other jurisdiction, including the European Commission, also have merger guidelines. Should they be treated in this same article? --213.219.165.8 (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. The subject of the article is the Department of Justice merger guidelines. Adding info about other jurisdictions would be on a different subject.

That being said, the article is, I think, misnamed. It would be better titled "Department of Justice merger guidelines." If another country's DoJ has merger guidelines, and an article discusses them, then it should be further renamed to something like "U.S. Department of Justice merger guidelines."

I'd suggest that if you have content for, for example, EC merger guidelines, write that article. This one should be renamed, and if there are both articles, either a dab page should be created for "merger guidelines," or theyt should be disambiguated via hatnotes. TJRC (talk) 02:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Merger guidelines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]