Talk:Iso (automobile)

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I've written Japanese edition of Iso (ja:イソ (自動車)) and I found on English Wikipedia there are two Iso articles, Iso Rivolta (this article) and Iso Automobile. I guess both refer to the same Italian motor company. Which should I choose as an interlang?--K.F. 03:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted. I didn't realized that there was an Iso Automobile article. I think it should definitely be merged into Iso Rivolta. I can do that, when I have a minute. Giuliopp 21:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, which of course is the reason for me applying the merge template. Since I'm a newbie on the english WP I'll want to wait with the execution until I learn more here, so Giuliopp: Feel free! Digglern 12:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

iso or Iso Rivolta

From the name Iso Grifo I would conclude that the marque was Iso, not Iso Rivolta. Any comments? 159.134.94.21 11:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's quite some confusion on the subject and I haven't got any sources at hand. I understand that the official company name never contained the family name Rivolta, although the brand became known as Iso Rivolta; so much so that the text Rivolta was eventually included in the company's logo [1]. It is debatable how this article should be named. Giuliopp 18:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Granted. However, the picture is on a website which constantly is talking about Iso. Indeed, even after Rivolta took over the company, cars were called Iso Grifo for example. Probably (Iso) Rivolta became synonimus for Iso.

Given that the official company name was Iso S.p.A Automoveicoli (as per the 1964 Observer's Book of Automobiles), I propose to change the page name to "Iso (automobile)". GTHO (talk) 22:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Name changed as proposed. GTHO (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iso Marlboro

On another point, Where is the F1 project, which I believe weas called Iso Marlboro?

Refer to Frank Williams Racing Cars for this. GTHO (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iso and Callaway?

I had stumbled upon this page a while back which talks about the Grifo 90 prototype from the 90's. Should we add a new section to include this information?

https://www.callawaycars.com/the-company/callaway-cars/%E2%80%A8rivolta/ --Thenerdyengineer (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Iso (automobile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]