Talk:Dibrugarh

India: Assam / Cities / Geography Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Assam (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Guideline

Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Matter without reference is likely to be deleted. -- P.K.Niyogi 23:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on 22nd September, 2013

'... transforming Dibrugarh into a mini city like Guwahati and Jorhat' was replaced with '...transforming Dibrugarh into a vibrant city like Guwahati.' Dibrugarh as a city can be compared with Guwahati only as a city. There is no justification of showing Jorhat as an example before Dibrugarh as city. Dibrugarh Municipality was established way back in 1873, whereas, Jorhat Municipality was established in 1909. The present municipal area of Dibrugah is 15.5 sq. kilometres with 22 wards, whereas that of Jorhat is widened to 9.20 sq. kilometres with 19 wards. ^[1] ^[2] Hence, the information - 'Jorhat ... second largest in Assam marking second metropolitan.' carried by the official website of Jorhat Municipal Board is false and misleading. Moreover, the term 'mini city' is a vague term. Officially the letters A, B,and C are used to categorize a city. The word 'vibrant' does not qualify a city regarding its size etc. but only signifies a place regarding its business and other activities and hence can safely and quite justifiably be used in case of Dibrugarh. Nborkakoty (talk) 15:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undit last reverts by User:shovon76

It was found that the area and population data from a reliable source was reverted to the earlier wrong data in the Infobox and hence the revert to line 39 has been undone. Moreover, there seems to be no need from wikipedia policies point of view to exactly reproduce a line from any reliable third party source in a wikipedia article. Hence the line ' Dibrugarh is the 2^nd nerve center of industry, communication and healthcare in the state of Assam after Guwahati' which has been added with a reference from a reliable source is also not a reproduction. Moreover, the rerference added do contain information that do vindicate the validity of the information in the line. However, details of industry, research and higher educational facilities in medical sciences as well as healthcare facilities and also the rail, road, air transport/communication facilities besides govt. and other media (mass communication) faclities that exist in and around Dibrugarh, which do make Dibrugarh a 'nerve centre in the state of Assam after Guwahati' can be provided separately with reference to a number of reliable third party sources if required. The added line describes the city of Dibrugarh briefly and correctly and also is a true introduction/representation of the city at the same time. This is how, information in the lead section of an article should be presented as per wikipedia norms. Nborkakoty (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nborkakoty, please refer to WP:RS. Dibrugarh municipality's website is a self-published source for this article. The other sources mentioned by you fail wikipedia's reliable sources criteria. Acquaint yourself with all the policies of Wiki before going on a reversion spree. Shovon (talk) 15:32, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The source is a municipal council, that is perfectly reliable for gods sake. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:41, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Darkness Shines, would you care to explain where is the mention of 2nd in Assam after Guwahati in that source of yours? Shovon (talk) 08:05, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to above

The source says '...the nerve center of all political, administrative, cultural and commercial activities of the Upper Assam region.' This peice of information clearly means Dibrugarh is 2^nd to none in Upper Assam so far as political, administrative, cultural and commercial activities are concerned and in a broader prespective 2^nd only to Guwahati in the state of Assam. However, if Dibrugarh is not, then we will be gald to learn if there is any other city in the state of Assam apart from Guwahati and outside Upper Assam, which can be termed as a nerve centre of industry, communication etc. in the true sense of the term. Moreover, a reliable source says, 'Dibrugarh is the second largest city of Assam. ...north-eastern region and its hub Dibrugarh.'^[3]. The reliability of this source is further vindicated by another reliable source ^[4]. It is true, because, it has not mentioned 'second populous' but mentioned 'second largest' and 'hub' correctly qualifying the city of Dibrugarh. Nborkakoty (talk) 11:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nborkakoty, would you care to explain your understanding of the political entity called Assam? Assam does not consist of only upper Assam FYKI. A reliable source would be the census data from GoI, which clearly shows Dibrugarh to be neither the 2nd largest nor the 2nd most populated. And please, do try and understand what constitute reliable sources. Shovon (talk) 13:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, The Hindu link does not even mention Dibrugarh. Shovon (talk) 13:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Center For Management Studies came under Dibrugarh University as study center. No need to specify it separately. Deepjyoti05 (talk) 16:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Deepjyoti05[reply]

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Dibrugarh. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for https://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=may2409/State9
Attempted to fix sourcing for https://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=nov2009/State9

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dibrugarh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.imdpune.gov.in/Temp_Extremes/histext2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dibrugarh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.imdpune.gov.in/Temp_Extremes/histext2010.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130406132625/https://www.arunachaltourism.com/top5.php to https://www.arunachaltourism.com/top5.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060504181808/https://archive.eci.gov.in/se2001/background/S03/AS_ACPC.pdf to https://archive.eci.gov.in/se2001/background/S03/AS_ACPC.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 18 external links on Dibrugarh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dibrugarh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130920083046/https://www.bharatdarshan.info/guwahati/ to https://www.bharatdarshan.info/guwahati/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dibrugarh is not actually a city

This has come to my grave concern that dibrugarh is not a city but mererly a town. If anyone bothers to accept my change please do so. PS:I don't have any citings to prove the abov stated so please help mme with that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:B28D:A63:B052:D0EB:487E:1F0D (talk) 16:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://dibrugarhmunicipality.org/about%20us.html

[2] ttps://www.jorhatmunicipalboard.org/

[3] ttps://ibnlive.in.com/news/beautiful-country-stories-from-assam-meghalaya/267176-40-102.html

[4] ttps://www.thehindu.com/features/magazine/invisible-india/article3001817.ece

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]