FACs needing feedback
viewedit
La Isla Bonita Review it now
Northern Bank robbery Review it now


The Signpost: 31 October 2019

edit

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

edit

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

edit

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

edit

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

edit

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

edit

Ella Wall Van Leer

edit

Hi, we noticed you made some updates to Ella's husband Blake and Georgia Tech in the past. We're trying to obtain online versions of Ella's extensive research into the Van Leer family and any help would be greatly appreciated. Please see Talk:Ella Lillian Wall Van Leer#Category:Van Leer family for discussion. Billywayne911 (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

edit

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

edit

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

edit

Proposed deletion of RadarCon

edit
 

The article RadarCon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant independant coverage outside of IEEE. Only seems to be calls for papers and announcements.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

edit

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

edit

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

edit

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

edit

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

edit

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

edit

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

edit

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

edit

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

edit

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

edit

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

edit

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

edit

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

edit

Orphaned non-free image File:American Society of Engineering Education logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:American Society of Engineering Education logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

edit

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

edit

Proposed deletion of Center for Agile Technology

edit
 

The article Center for Agile Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MB 04:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

edit

FAR for ANAK Society

edit

I have nominated ANAK Society for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 19:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

edit

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

edit

You've got mail

edit
 
Hello, Disavian. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doug Weller talk 08:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Latest preview software release/Trillian

edit

 Template:Latest preview software release/Trillian has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

edit

Multiple Georgia Tech articles proposed for deletion

edit
 

I have proposed that several Georgia Tech articles be deleted:

I made all of these nominations for the same reason:

Cited sources do not indicate that the subject is independently notable (notability is not inherited from the indisputably notable parent institution)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice on each article, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the articles' talk pages.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ElKevbo (talk) 05:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've nominated these articles for deletion; I've bundled them together at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scheller College of Business. ElKevbo (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

edit

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

edit

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

edit

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

edit

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Georgia Tech Bulletin

edit

 Template:WikiProject Georgia Tech Bulletin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:30, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

edit

Nomination of Horizons Ventures for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horizons Ventures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horizons Ventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HighKing++ 15:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

edit

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

edit

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

edit

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

edit

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

edit

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

edit

"Georgia Tech traditions/GA1" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Georgia Tech traditions/GA1 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 8 § Georgia Tech traditions/GA1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 01:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

edit

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

edit

Good article reassessment for Dyson sphere

edit

Dyson sphere has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. TompaDompa (talk) 23:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

edit

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

edit

Proposed deletion of Jerry Green (American football)

edit
 

The article Jerry Green (American football) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

edit

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

edit

Hello Disavian! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 17:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

edit

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

edit

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

edit

Good article reassessment for Georgia Tech

edit

Georgia Tech has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Bneu2013 (talk) 21:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

edit

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

edit

FAR for Tech Tower

edit

I have nominated Tech Tower for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 02:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

edit

Good article reassessment for Louise Glover

edit

Louise Glover has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 07:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

edit
 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

edit

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

edit

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

edit

Nomination of Redwood Robotics for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redwood Robotics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redwood Robotics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

बिनोद थारू (talk) 02:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Redwood Robotics logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Redwood Robotics logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The page Talk:C Sharp (programming language)/Archive 4 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G6 Created in error by archiving to the wrong page. Current content only an Archive nav template

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Trialpears (talk) 18:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for E (mathematical constant)

edit

E (mathematical constant) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

"T:WPTECH" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect T:WPTECH has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 22 § T:WPTECH until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

"0 A.D. (video game" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect 0 A.D. (video game has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 12 § 0 A.D. (video game until a consensus is reached. —Alalch E. 03:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology

edit

Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets football

edit

Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets football has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Transformers articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for My Opposition

edit

My Opposition has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Technique (newspaper)

edit

Technique (newspaper) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 03:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply