Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
editCreated
edit- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
editMy other accounts
edit- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
edit
Administrative backlog
editReports
edit- 146.199.146.160 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:43, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1700:9856:240:2413:40c4:2423:8f87 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:408d:321b:e18f::1366:40b1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- 219.92.207.150 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Pure destruction of users. Astro Alpha Plus (talk) 22:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2602:F919:100:0:0:0:0:2C (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Soldering: Repeated linkspamming across electronics articles. Andy Dingley (talk) 03:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Im gonna make the longest username in existance (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Irwasfiudirudfenu112221398 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Santanu243 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used 2 instead of s attempting to skip filter: anus. Violating string: santanus43" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- Mikeleenews (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See contribs. Synorem (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Torontomasque (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Representing Toronto Masque Threatre. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 23:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Article was protected back in July due to an IP user consistently removing information with multiple sources. Now that article is no longer protected, the same user is deleting the information using a new IP address. NJZombie (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS per BLPGROUP. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continued disruptive IP editing. Useddenim (talk) 13:24, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Too much edit wars and reverts are taking place. People are randomly changing box office numbers without looking at the reliable source. Hence requesting for Extended confirmed protection.PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 13:28, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
+1 Reason: High level of vandalism by users on this page changing the boxoffice figure without citing reliable source. I can not say if canvassing or socks are attempted here. Some of these users are Special:Contributions/Shivraj0007 Special:Contributions/Manavchoudhury21 Special:Contributions/N0riooo Special:Contributions/RD55555 Special:Contributions/Jashpin. Special protection will help on this page and please revert to this last reliable version. Adding one more Special:Contributions/Bharatiya1177 who uses source with reports from the film producers that is unreliable. This disruptive editing is out of control on this page. RangersRus (talk) 14:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I am not seeing a lot of reverting. Yes, it's being heavily edited; it's entirely possible in that situation that IP users are in good faith using bad sources—can we reasonably expect them to know? 02:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC) Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: This page is getting canvassing attempts from external websites trying to form a consensus to place a currently unofficial flag in the infobox Abo Yemen✉ 13:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Abo Yemen: Assuming that it does not reveal private information about a specific Wikipedian, would you please post a link to where the canvassing is coming from? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Castle of Illusion Starring Mickey Mouse (2013 video game) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per WP:GSCASTE, recently blocked IP ranges from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truthfindervert are editing warring in order to restore their edits. - Ratnahastin (talk) 16:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- off-course but wait a second I really think there is not any generic need to confine any conditional protection of Chhura and for the sack of god i don't know what this man talking about but holding up my simple adherence is for Mazhabi Sikh[1]showcasing my edit summary hey look still anything to say go ahead @User:Ratnahastin
adhering source which convey mazha (Mazhabi Sih) Jati are recruited in army of Sikhs prior to dogra rajput
whatsoever intentionally miss out my point and twisting it for unnecessary clotting on the other side the @Truthfundervert extracted the laddhar stanza [2]
- which furiously even consoled with my aspirational editing i think its unreasonable since i am using Vi telecom network so it common anyone can edit, even locative to same region
- Note: Anyone can mediate if did any kind misconception thank aloy 2402:8100:2B79:F9E5:447:627E:E057:DBC0 (talk) 17:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Pending not sufficient. High vandalism. Request for long semiprotection. Island92 (talk) 17:56, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by unregistered users. Yuvaank (talk) 18:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption by IPs and new accounts over the result in the infobox. Mellk (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under ARBEE. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Michigan fan vandalismChar3290 (talk) 20:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-protection: Contentious topics: Should be extended-protected since this article is related to the arab-israeli conflict. 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 21:28, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:58, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated removal of sourced content by IP Yung Doohickey (talk) 21:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Yngdoohickey is inflating numbers in articles and POV pushing. Every source says 377 victims. Even in the article itself it says: "As of March 2008, the remains of 345 massacre victims have been identified and returned to Kosovo and 32 remain missing". He found an old source speculating on the numbers and wants to add it. There is memorial and commemoration every year for the victims and reports, every source says 377 victims, even Albanian sources [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
He wants to put the article into protection so his inflated number stays and that's wrong. --2607:FEA8:101E:CE00:7D91:2CAD:FEF4:5B00 (talk) 22:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Added CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Same flag problem with other Syria related articles. Regioncalifornia (talk) 22:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Intermittent but persistent long-term vandalism by an anonymous editor who uses various IP addresses. The only edits to this article over the past year have been vandalism, and reverts thereof. As the article is about an event that happened a decade ago, few to none further changes are expected. Requesting page protection for an indefinite amount of time. Dmoore5556 (talk) 23:13, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion through IPs. Za-ari-masen (talk) 23:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sergiogriffiths (talk) 23:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing seems to have happened here on over six months. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. Page has a lengthy history of protection, most recently for 2 years but previously for 1 year. (and expired) I think it's now time for indefinite semi-protection because of it's lengthy protection history. 50.100.44.204 (talk) 00:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since there have been no edits by non-autoconfirmed users in two whole weeks there's no need for protection at this time. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Frequent spot for vandalism, however there still are constructive edits as well. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Page was protected for 3 days, I am now requesting another stint of semi for a longer period. The page is still receiving unsourced content additions from IPs since protection expired. The content is related to an unconfirmed sports transaction. DaHuzyBru (talk) 02:05, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, seasonal vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism - requesting temporary semi-protection Patternbuffered (talk) 03:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason:Article is in a poorly written state and barely gets meaningful contributions since it was last protected. No signs of disruptive editing for a long time either.Axedd (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Axedd: Is the long-term abuser that caused the article to be ECP'd still active on other articles? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The article was protected back in 2010, when protecting standards were far lower. I believe it's now ready to go unprotected, Cheers. 50.100.53.53 (talk) 04:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm willing to try unprotection after 14 years of indef protection, unless Courcelles objects. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The information and contents are totally incorrect and without credibility which provide wrong information public. FactsFinderKhorasan (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined So go make an edit request at Talk:Afghanistan. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:40, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption from last protect. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:40, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez. This is the section for requesting a reduction in protection level. Is that what you are asking for? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:26, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. Don't know how this happened, I just used Twinkle as I normally do to add the request and this is where it ended up. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Just ignore this request. I'll try again and see if it gets added properly. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not unprotected per above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sergiogriffiths (talk) 23:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Sergiogriffiths. This is the section for requesting a reduction in protection level. Is that what you are asking for? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.
The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,
Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.
I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥ 论 01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
editA historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
| 11 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrollededit
I would kindly like to submit a request for autopatrolled rights. I have created 50+ articles since 2017, which you will find listed on my user page here, none of which have been deleted nor have received any new page reviewers' comments in quite some time. I have also improved thousands more articles across Wikipedia. I am mainly interested in increasing the coverage of all things Brussels-related. Thanks in advance! Jason Lagos (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly 10 years with over 1000 edits, with 32 live articles primarily focusing on topic elated to asian audio visual and the institute in Bangladesh. Thank you for considering my request. UzbukUdash (talk) 07:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
User:Pbritti told me to. Apparently I qualify, and I've been cranking out a decent number of articled recently. Been editing Wikipedia on and off since 2009, been editing more regularly for the last year or two. Been a rollbacker and pending changes reviewer for almost 12 years. I created one GA and have taken two articles from being just a few sentences to GA status, a few more nominations in the pipeline. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 02:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
During the temporary stint granted as autopatrolled, I have created over 100 pages following the suggestions of the admin. Have been consistently adding relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them. Have also started using Rater and StubSorter. Trying to strengthen myself with Wikipedia's core content policies by regular reading. Requesting extension... Davidindia (talk) 09:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowseredit
I want to get into the swing of helping out in more ways other than RCP/PCP. Manually editing each article can only do so much. This would be handy to have. Synorem (talk) 06:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Perform article maintenance on date formats, typos, etc. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 18:53, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request access to AutoWikiBrowser to assist with minor edits, formatting, and other repetitive tasks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting permission to use AutoWikiBrowser mainly to fix MOS:ACCESS issues and more specifically MOS:HEAD, MOS:PSEUDOHEAD, and MOS:COLOR on articles. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 05:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Renamed from AWBunny, which is my alt and already on list. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmededit
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Adding to the pregnancy portion to the cancer page. I have worked on this piece for a whlie and have valid citations and sources. This is for a school project and not an act of vandalism or false information. Prarthanarawal (talk) 19:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi! Could I please have confirmed on this account? It'd be useful for testing the upload wizard without the various settings I have on my main account. Thanks, Mdaniels5757's sock (talk) 04:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmededit
In the beginning of November my EC permissions have been revoked by User:ScottishFinnishRadish due to what he considered to be gaming, because of me doing a large number of minor edits requested as part of the CW Project. SFR said that he would not object to the restoration of my EC permissions once I made a few hundred more substantial edits. Since then I made over 350 edits, mainly on pages related to mathematics and food security, and I believe this should qualify me for restoration of extended-confirmed permissions. DancingOwl (talk) 17:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
I would like to be able to publish a growing stack of articles pending on my translation list, this will allow for wikipedia to have multiple buried local articles only available in some languages to be accessible for a wider base of international readers in English, I hope you will accept my request. Lubatchovsky (talk) 13:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I am writing to formally request the reinstatement of my extended account rights on Wikipedia. Previously, these rights were revoked due to concerns regarding my use of an automatic translator, which was perceived as "gaming the rules." Since then, I have completed few hundred manual edits, as requested to regain it, to demonstrate my commitment to improving content and adhering to the community's standards. Michael Boutboul (talk) 22:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I had another account that I forgot the credentials to access it. I am a professional translator who is eager to contribute to Wikipedia. Therefore, I request extended confirmation. Burak Mahmutoğlu (talk) 10:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page revieweredit
I see that there is a large backlog, so I would like to help reduce it, especially the redirects, as I have more experience with them. I have not created any articles, but I have read the tutorials for NPR and related pages, so I will not make any unintentional (or intentional) detrimental edits. I am familiar with WP:BLAR, WP:PROD and WP:AfD, and have behaved civilly with other editors. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia now for 14 years (which I can't believe) and I have had the rollback permission for over a decade. I have also been a pending changes reviewer for a similar amount of time although I rarely participate in that sphere. I tend to focus within recent changes patrol as well as counter-vandalism efforts, but I also perform more traditional edits to articles--especially within gerontology-related topics and feel I have a strong understanding on what is appropriate for Wikipedia and what is not. I am familiar with the CSD, AFD, and PROD criterion and have nominated pages for such in the past. I would want the permission to work on the backlog and ultimately be able to assist in a more versatile manner than I currently am able to. --Thebirdlover (talk) 02:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC) I had to think about this because it was so long ago, but I also remember reviewing pages off of the NewPagesFeed back in the day before it was a formal user right. I cannot think of any dispute anyone had with the calls I made—some of the pages I reviewed were later deleted, but 5-10 years after I reviewed them. Check the public logs for examples. --Thebirdlover (talk) 13:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly 10 years with over 1000 edits, with 32 live articles primarily (yes, mistakenly got a copyright report for an article) focusing on topic elated to asian audio visual and the institute in Bangladesh. Thank you for considering my request. UzbukUdash (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to become an NPR to help reduce the work, I regularly intervene on drafts and edit them to format them and put banners or comments to advise the creator on the steps to follow so that this draft becomes eligible, in the case that it is possible. I know the rules of Wikipedia and the essential points determining if an article is eligible or not. I see drafts being submitted but they are clearly not ready to be accepted and unfortunately I can't do anything at this time. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello I'm TyphoonAmpil. I'm meet all minimum requirements. I'm over 45+ AfC reviews and 5+ Accepted drafts. I'm adding tags {{orphan}} and {{uncategorized}} tags. I'm created 4 articles named Tropical Storm Maria (2024), Typhoon Ampil (2024), Typhoon Shanshan (2024), Typhoon Krathon. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 04:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
As a current pending changes reviewer, I would like to request the new page reviewer permission. I believe that I can review new pages, fact-check them, and help reduce creation vandalism. Z. Patterson (talk) 20:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page moveredit
I have been doing NPP for a while in the physical sciences, with a bit of editing, creating a few articles and AfC. Several times during NPP I have come across "messes" where relics such as drafts have been left behind by inexperienced users. I would like to have the ability to move without a redirect. I don't expect to be using it that often, probably once a month at most. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:27, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Experienced editor (10k+ edits; acccout over 5 years old), requesting this permission for occassional page moves I come across that need to be done also from moving drafts out into mainspace. Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 01:14, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been participating and closing RMs for a while. I would like this perm to fulfill more requests at RM/TR. For now I have one draftify, but would like to eventually dab into more. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes revieweredit
I've read and understood WP:RPC and will proceed slowly at first (that is, leave what I deem edge cases to someone else). JayCubby Talk 17:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
I'm a humanities student from India, so I can review South Asian history, culture, societal norm very carefully and with authentic information. Malhar1234 (talk) 08:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollbackedit
Requesting rollback permission to combat the pervasive presence of vandalism and/or edits of unencyclopedic quality to the best of my ability. At the present moment I am a semi-retired user; however, I have been a regular patroller of recent changes to both specific pages as well as the site as a whole. I'd very much like to learn the counter-vandalism tool RedWarn and/or Ultraviolet and get involved to a greater extent across the site in keeping pages up to editors' standards - I intend to be a long-term contributor to the site and expect to be much more active in the future, predominantly in this line of work. I've familiarized myself with WP:VANDTYPES and have encountered and attempted thus far to manually revert instances of controversial edits at times - edits which it would be far more helpful to all parties to take care of via rollback. I'd particularly like to delve into new ways to spot the more subtle instances that go unnoticed for longer periods of time, per WP:SNEAKY, as well as monitor for violations of WP:TPV and continually make an effort to practice WP:WARNVAND, WP:HTSV, WP:NOTVANDALISM, WP:RVAN and WP:NORESVAND among others. My most notable effort to prevent escalated conflict(s) would be in the Talk:Wings_of_Fire_(novel_series)#February_2023_Content_Editing_Conflict, though I do not yet have a track record of notifying users when reverting their edits beyond discussions on article talk pages (though this is typically as the reverted editor has tended to initiate the conversations first). Furthermore, I intend to prioritize diligently monitoring sockfarm-targeted pages in addition watching out for recent changes. Please let me know if you'd like me to undergo training and/or further regulatory practice first - and thank you for your consideration of me for this responsibility. ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 19:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like rollback permissions to make fighting vandalism quicker and easier. I have been reverting vandalism for over 1 month and have experience with tools such as Twinkle and Ultraviolet. I would also like to be able to have access to Huggle to make my anti-vandalism experience easier. MouseCursor (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Dealing with a lot of vandalism lately. Undoing, warning and reporting. Hope that undoing could be made easier with Rollback rights. YBSOne (talk) 20:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi, requesting rollback permission for my counter-vandalism efforts, as I would like to quickly remove obvious vandalism and to access helpful tools. I have been active in this area for several months here and even longer on dewiki. Therefore, I am familiar with the relevant guidelines and tools. With regards, –MrBenjo (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC) MrBenjo (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Would be used for reverting edits by blocked socks of banned users, similar to this request nableezy - 20:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
This permission will help me in combating vandalism. I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes, always warning users when necessary, assuming good faith, and taking full responsibility for all my edits. I also do crosswiki patrolling and recently joined the SWMT. — Tres Libras (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I am here to reapply for rollback permissions to assist in combating vandalism more efficiently. Over time, I have actively reverted vandalism using the "undo" tool and have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's policies, particularly vandalism and rollback.I fully understand that rollback should only be used for clear cases of vandalism, and I am committed to using the tool responsibly. My contributions reflect my dedication to maintaining Wikipedia's quality and integrity.If there are any concerns or further clarification needed regarding my request, please let me know. Thank you for considering my request.MP1999 ❯❯❯ Talk 11:03, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to give Huggle and AntiVandal a try. Polygnotus (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I had been actively patrolling RC in 2023 but paused for a long time since I was too busy. I plan to resume soon and would like rollback rights to make it easier. Note from 07:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC): I had just been informed that RedWarn can be used on a school computer, so it's very likely that I will be using it. xRozuRozu • teacups 23:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting access in order to enhance my ability to help protect Wikipedia from vandalism. This permission will grant me access to additional tools that will assist in maintaining the integrity of the platform. Hemlock :3 leave a message 03:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Immediate requests
edit| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 1 |
| Requests for unblock | 96 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 1 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
edit| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 577 |
| Templates for deletion | 110 |
| Categories for deletion | 111 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 54 |
| All redirects for discussion | 321 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 17 |
| Possible copyright violations | 10 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 209 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 120 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 1 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 1 |
Image copyright problems
edit| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 370 |
| Unknown copyright status | 42 |
| Unknown source | 81 |
| No non-free use rationale | 8 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 32 |
Page protection
edit| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,241 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 443 |
| Protected against vandalism | 4 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,276 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
edit|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 33,990 | 0.49 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,003 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,338 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 39,979 | 0.58 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 11,131 | 0.16 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 535,041 | 7.73 |
| All articles lacking sources | 71,721 | 1.04 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 8 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 474,553 | 6.86 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,612 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,491 | 1.52 |
| All articles with dead external links | 313,851 | 4.53 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 139 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 18 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles to be merged | 1,094 | 0.02 |
| All articles to be split | 810 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 4 | - |
| Stub categories | 19,264 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 661 | 0.01 |
| All orphaned articles | 53,009 | 0.77 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 0 | 0 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,579 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,757 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,501 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
edit| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 681 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,355 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,763 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 4 |
| All articles to be expanded | 65,980 |
Special pages
edit| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
editHong Kong
edit
Misc
edit Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||