Talk:Tical (unit)

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia Low‑importance

Tical (unit) is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. https://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Myanmar Low‑importance

Tical (unit) is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

Thailand Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 8 September 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Tical to Tical (unit). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 8 September 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 15:24, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tical → Tical (unit) – Given the minimal number of pageviews this article gets, compared to the 1994 Method Man album, it cannot be considered primary. Per WP:NOPRIMARY, Tical should be a disambiguation page. 162 etc. (talk) 03:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Comment: If moved, please let it be done by an admin who can do a history split and move only the versions since August 2021, restoring the disambiguation page before that. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Anthony Appleyard has done a history split, so the closer should now be able to perform the move the regular way. The disambiguation page now at Tical (disambiguation) should also be moved to Tical if the discussion is closed as move. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Comment: This page was converted to an article just a month ago, so page views beyond that wouldn't tell much (though views during the past month still shows significant difference). Not sure if this counts as WP:RECENTISM, as the album was released over twenty years ago, but practically all Google Books search results are about the unit of weight/currency. Both the Thai baht and Cambodian tical are derived from the unit, so the article serves as a WP:CONCEPTDAB for both of them, but not the album. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Right, my interpretation is that Tical (unit) wins on long-term notability, and Tical (album) wins on pageviews; hence neither is primary. 162 etc. (talk) 14:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Okay, support. I've given this some thought and the line of reasoning makes sense. I wouldn't mind if this is closed early as unnecessary; if so I'll ask Anthony Appleyard directly to do the split. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Weak support the unit is probably primary by long-term significance but not by usage, 476,166 views for the album v 23,456 for the unit so a DAB is probably the best compromise. Crouch, Swale (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic