Talk:Orica

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Prisoner of Zenda in topic Incidents in Australia

Proposed edits to page

edit
Proposed draft
Orica Limited
Company typePublic
ASXORI
IndustryMetals, mining, oil and gas, construction, tunnelling
FoundedAustralia
HeadquartersOrica House
East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Key people
Malcolm Broomhead (Non-Executive Director & Chairman)
Alberto Calderon (Managing Director & CEO)[1]
ProductsExplosives, Sodium cyanide, Ground support
Revenue  AUD 5.1 billion (2016)
Number of employees
11,500 (2016)
Websitewww.orica.com

Orica Limited (ASXORI) is an Australian-based multinational corporation that is the world’s largest provider of commercial explosives and blasting systems to the mining, quarrying, oil and gas and construction markets, a supplier of sodium cyanide for gold extraction, and a specialist provider of ground support services in mining and tunnelling.


Founded in 1874, Orica has more than 140 years of history and has a workforce of around 11,500 employees and contractors, servicing customers across more than 100 countries. Orica is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASXORI).


History

edit

Initially formed over 140 years ago as Jones, Scott and Co., a supplier of explosives during the Victorian gold rush, the company was bought by Nobel Industries. Nobel later merged with several British chemical manufacturers to form Imperial Chemical Industries. In 1928, Imperial Chemical Industries of Australia and New Zealand (ICIANZ) was incorporated to acquire and coordinate all the Australasian interests of ICI Plc.


In July 1997, ICI Australia became an independent Australasian company after its parent company, ICI Plc, divested its 62.4 per cent shareholding in the company. As a result of the selldown ICI Australia was required to change its name and on 2 February 1998 became known as Orica.


In 2010, Orica successfully demerged Dulux Group leaving the company to focus on the provision of services to the mining, construction and infrastructure industries.


In November 2014, Orica Limited announced the sale of its Chemicals business to the Blackstone Group. The sale was completed on 2 March 2015, and the Chemicals business now operates under the name 'Ixom'.


Financial Performance

edit

Orica's revenue in 2016 was AUD$5.1 billion and statutory net profit after tax (NPAT) attributable to the shareholders of Orica for the full year ended 30 September 2016 was $343 million.[2]


Other key components of the 2016 financial result included:

  • Total ammonium nitrate (AN) product volumes of 3.54 million tonnes (pcp: 3.76 mt)
  • Underlying EBITDA of $908 million (pcp: $978 million)
  • Business improvements delivered incremental net benefits of $76 million
  • Capital Expenditure of $263 million (below the forecast provided at the 2016 interim results of approximately $320 million)
  • Gearing of 36% (pcp: 40%), reflecting the reduction in net debt to $1,549 million (pcp: $2,026 million)
  • Net operating and investing cash flows up 80% at $633 million
  • Final ordinary dividend of 29 cents per share (55% payout ratio), franked at 8 cents per share, and representing a full year payout ratio of 48% and a final combined dividend for the financial year of 49.5 cents per share.


Leadership

edit

Chairman

The Board chairman is Malcolm Broomhead, Non-Executive Director of Orica Limited since December 2015 and Chairman as of 1 January 2016. Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee.[3]

Director of BHP Billiton Ltd & Plc. Former Chairman of Asciano Limited.

Director of the Walter & Eliza Hall Institute, Chairman of the Australia China One Belt One Road Advisory Board and Council Member of Opportunity International Australia.


Managing Director and CEO

The Managing Director and CEO of Orica is Alberto Calderon. Non-Executive Director since August 2013. Appointed Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer on 19 May 2015.

Former Group Executive and Chief Executive of BHP Billiton, Aluminium, Nickel and Corporate Development. Former Chief Executive Officer of Cerrejón Coal Company and Colombian oil company, Ecopetrol. Member of Investment Advisory Committee for New York Mining Fund AR Capital GP II Ltd.


Sustainability

edit

Orica is a member of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI), the Australian SAM Sustainability Index (AuSSI) and the FTSE4Good Index. These Indexes provide a benchmark for the performance of investments in sustainable companies and funds. Orica releases an annual Sustainability Report that outlines performance against key sustainability metrics.[4]


In 2014, Orica was identified as a global leader in Natural Capital Decoupling,[5] which shows the ability of organisations to ‘decouple’ financial growth from environmental impact, by increasing revenue whilst decreasing their absolute impact.


Markets/Industries

edit

Orica operates across the following markets and industries:


Products & Services

edit

Orica operates three primary business areas:


Blasting

Orica is the world’s largest provider of commercial explosives and blasting systems to the mining, quarrying, oil and gas and construction markets. [6]

Products and services include:

  • Contracted Services
  • Initiators
  • Boosters
  • Bulk Explosives
  • Packaged Explosives
  • Data, Reporting & Analytics
  • Supplementary Services
  • Seismic Systems

Trade names used for packaged explosives include: Senatel™, Fortel™, Apex™, Amex™, Impact™, Simex™, Powergel™ and Eurodyn™.[7] "Power Gel" was a U.S. Registered Trademark for Hercules Inc. in 1967, but it is now owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty Ltd.[8][9]


Ground Support (Minova)

In 2015 Orica Limited restructured its ground support operations under a dedicated global management team, and re-established the well-known and highly regarded Minova name and brand.[10]

Minova is a global manufacturer and supplier of chemical and mechanical earth control products, adhesives and support equipment. With manufacturing plants on five continents and operations in more than 25 countries, Minova is a provider of ground support solutions for the underground mining, construction, tunnelling and civil engineering industries.

Minova is a member of the Orica Group.

Products and services include:

  • Steel Bolts and Plates
  • Glassfibre Reinforced Polymer bolts
  • Injectable Chemicals and Foams
  • Mesh
  • Resin Capsules
  • Cementitious Grouts & Coatings
  • Pumps
  • Soil Anchoring Systems
  • Ballast Bonding Polymers
  • Accessories and Engineering Services

For more information regarding Minova, please visit 'www.minovaglobal.com'


Sodium Cyanide

Orica is a supplier of sodium cyanide for gold extraction.

Products and services include:

  • Analysers
  • PRO Service
  • Data, Reporting & Analytics
  • Sparge
  • Training


Cycling Sponsorship

edit

Orica is co-naming sponsor of the Orica–Scott men’s and women’s professional cycling team.

In June 2016, Orica announced that it would be exiting its sponsorship of the men’s and women’s cycling teams at the end of the 2017 calendar year.[11]


Orica House

edit
 
ICI House

Once Australia's tallest building, the former ICI Building in East Melbourne, now Orica House, was Australia's tallest during the 1950s[citation needed] and was one of the first high-rise buildings in Australia's cities. It is one of the few post-war office buildings to be found on the Victorian Heritage Register.[citation needed]


Incidents

edit

Corporate

edit
Bullying Scandal
edit

In March 2015 then CEO Ian Smith was ousted from the business due to bullying of a female employee.[12]

In Australia

edit
Botany, New South Wales
edit
Chlorination of the Botany aquifer
edit

Remediation began in 2005 after production of chlorinated solvents by ICI over many years resulted in significant contamination of the Botany aquifer, a high quality sand aquifer located below the eastern suburbs of Sydney, New South Wales. The main chemical contaminant found in groundwater around the old ICI site is EDC (1,2-dichloroethane), a persistent organic pollutant and byproduct of the manufacture of PVC. Orica has built an A$167 million Groundwater Treatment Plant (GTP) to achieve containment of this contamination and provide high quality industrial water to Botany Industrial Park. Water produced by Orica's GTP saves Sydney's potable water supply around 5 megalitres (1.1 million imperial gallons; 1.3 million US gallons) per day (approx 0.5% of Sydney's water demand). Residents in the area were banned from accessing the groundwater. Orica estimated in 2012 that the GTP had been in operation for seven years of its 30–year design life cycle.[13]

Mercury leak, 2011
edit

The Botany chemical plant released mercury vapour into the atmosphere on 27 September 2011, breaching environmental standards for nine hours.[14][15] An air monitor located near residents at Banksmeadow[16] detected the mercury vapour and the Office of Environment and Heritage was notified.[14] Dr Mariann Lloyd Smith, said the length of time the emissions last was extraordinary, "Mercury is extremely toxic. It is recognised as one of the most important and most hazardous toxins that we deal with, and there is currently a UN negotiation for a global treaty on mercury to address this," she said.[15] The mercury vapour was associated with mercury which had polluted the soil on the Orica site, due to leaking pipes.[14] Robyn Parker, the New South Wales Minister for the Environment & Heritage said "I am incredibly angry and disappointed that yet again we have another incident with Orica."[15] In January 2013, the NSW EPA announced that it would conduct a review of off-site emissions of mercury.[17]

Mercury leak, 2012
edit

On 17 January 2012 Orica reported a mercury leak at its Port Botany plant, the second mercury incident since August 2011. In a series of samples of environmental air, the EPA recorded a mercury level of 0.0049 grams per cubic metre (8.3×10−6 pounds per cubic yard); more than double the regulatory limit of 0.002 grams per cubic metre (3.4×10−6 pounds per cubic yard).[18] The leak occurred in December 2011 and Orica failed to report the leak to authorities until the following month.[19] The site of the breach was the thermal desorbtion stack at the company's carpark waste remediation project, which was closed when the breach occurred. The NSW Environmental Protection Authority said the incident was not linked to the mercury emissions breach in September at Orica's other Botany site on Beauchamp Road.[20]

Gladstone, Queensland
edit
Cyanide leaks, 2012
edit

On 8 June 2012 the Queensland Department of Environment launched a legal prosecution against Orica in the Gladstone Magistrates' Court. The company was charged with 279 counts of willfully contravening its approvals in relation to alleged cyanide leaks into Gladstone Harbour.[21] The government claimed that in January and February 2012, Orica discharged effluent water containing heightened levels of cyanide into Gladstone Harbour.[22] "The charges are related to allegations that the company did not inform The Department of the Environment. The charges related to a breach of conditions rather than any environmental harm per se".[23]

Kooragang Island, New South Wales
edit

Throughout August and December 2011 Orica had six major chemicals incidents or leaks in Australia. The first one was a leak of hexavalent chromium from its ammonium nitrate plant near Stockton that affected 70 households; the second one was the release of arsenic into the Hunter River at Newcastle; the third was of mercury vapours from its Botany site;[24] the fourth was a leak of ammonia from its site at Kooragang Island;[25] the fifth was an ammonium nitrate leak of 20,000 litres (4,400 imperial gallons; 5,300 US gallons) at its Kooragang Island plant, only a day after being allowed to reopen; and the sixth incident was a sulphuric acid leak of approximately 3,000–4,000 litres (660–880 imp gal; 790–1,060 US gal) at its Port Kembla site.[26] The fourth leak triggered a public forum and NSW Government investigation into the leaks, and the temporary shut down of the Kooragang Island plant.[25]

Hexavalent chromium leak, 2011
edit

Orica’s Kooragang Island chemical plant released hexavalent chromium into the atmosphere on 8 August 2011. The known carcinogen was released between 6 and 6:30pm and the spill continued for approximately 20 minutes.[27] An estimated 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) of hexavalent chromium was discharged from the Orica plant, with another 35–60 grams (1.2–2.1 oz) over the suburb of Stockton.[28][29] Approximately 20 workers at the plant were exposed as well as 70 nearby homes in Stockton.[30] Orica failed to notify government authorities until 16 hours after the incident and residents were not formally notified for three days.[31] Under a Prevention Notice issued on 11 August 2011, the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) closed the ammonia plant at Kooragang Island.[32] The hexavalent chromium leak was the subject of a New South Wales Parliament Upper House inquiry, that was concluded in February 2012.

Hunter River arsenic leak, 2011
edit

Effluent containing high levels of arsenic leaked into the Hunter River from the Kooragang Island chemical plant on 19 August 2011 at 3pm.[33] Arsenic had not been used on the site since 1993, however during a cleanup of a hexavalent chromium spill on the site the week prior, old deposits of arsenic leaked into a storage pond and drained into the Hunter River.[34] It was estimated the arsenic concentration was 0.067 milligrams per litre, exceeding licence limits.[34] Barry O'Farrell, the NSW Premier said "two spills in a fortnight raise reasonable concerns about systemic failures in the way in which this company is operating its facilities."[35] O'Farrell continued, "I've had a gutful of families being distressed, by potential threats to their safety and threats to their local environment."[34]

Ammonia leak, 2011
edit

On 9 November 2011 more than 900 kilograms (2,000 lb) of ammonia was initially suspected of venting to the atmosphere from the Kooragang Island plant during a 45-minute period. The venting was due to a relief valve operating to prevent overpressure of a liquid ammonia tank. Engineering studies subsequently revised the amount down to ~90 kilograms (200 lb).[36] The leak was identified by firefighters responding to an alarm raised by the hospitalisation of two railway workers at Mayfield who were affected by the plume of escaping gas.[37] Six fire units and a hazardous chemicals unit were called to the chemical plant to deal with the leak of the ammonia gas.[38] Despite initial statements by Orica that the leak posed no public health risk,[38] two rail workers in the nearby suburb of Mayfield East were overcome by ammonia fumes and were taken to hospital with breathing difficulties.[36] Less than an hour before the ammonia leak, the Environment Protection Authority announced it would take Orica to court over the hexavalent chromium leak which occurred on 8 August 2011 at the same plant.[38]

Ammonium nitrate leak, 2011
edit

On 7 December 2011, in excess of 20,000 litres (4,400 imp gal; 5,300 US gal) of weak ammonium nitrate (<35%) solution/fertilizer leaked onto grassed areas at the Kooragang Island chemical plant. Emergency services were called to the site including a HAZMAT team.[39] The spill occurred less than a day after the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would allow the reopening of part of the Kooragang Island plant. Local residents continued to criticise the company for failing to notify residents in a timely manner and called for the plant to remain closed.[40]

Hydrogen stack fire, 2012
edit

On 8 January 2012 lightning ignited hydrogen being released from the plant. Flames higher than 20 metres (66 ft) leapt from the hydrogen stack and were reported by local residents to authorities.[41]

Port Kembla, New South Wales
edit
Sulphuric acid leak, 2011
edit

A spill of approximately 3,000–4,000 litres (660–880 imperial gallons; 790–1,060 US gallons) of concentrated sulphuric acid occurred at the Port Kembla chemical plant on 16 December 2011.[42] The leak was suspected to be caused by a hole in the ship-to-shore pipeline. Acting chief environmental regulator Mark Gifford from the NSW EPA said he was concerned about the ongoing incidents with Orica.[43]

In Mexico

edit
Coahuila
edit
Explosion, 2007
edit

On 10 September 2007, 28 people were killed and over 250 injured in Coahuila, Mexico, as a result of an accident between a pick-up and a truck which resulted in an explosion. The truck was transporting about 25 metric tons of ammonium nitrate under contract for the company Orica near the cities of Monclova and Cuatro Cienegas. Exact numbers of the dead and injured vary according to source. Orica's website stated there were a total of 28 fatalities in 2007 - one worker and 27 contractors/members of the public.[44][45][46]

References

edit
  1. ^ Orica Annual Report 2016, Nov 2016, orica.com. Retrieved 13 December 2016.
  2. ^ "Results and Presentations". Reports. Orica Limited. 2016.
  3. ^ "Orica Board". Executives and Committees. Orica Limited. 2016.
  4. ^ "Orica Sustainability Reports". Orica Limited. 2016.
  5. ^ "The Natural Capital Leaders Index". Trucost.
  6. ^ Simon, Hermann (2009). Hidden Champions of the 21st Century : Success Strategies of unknown World Market Leaders. London: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-98147-5.
  7. ^ "Packaged Explosives". www.oricaminingservices.com.
  8. ^ https://tmsearch.uspto.gov Reg.No. 72286670, 11 Dec 1967
  9. ^ https://tmsearch.uspto.gov Reg.No. 78327856, 13 Nov 2003
  10. ^ "Orica re-launch Minova". Australian Mining.
  11. ^ "Orica to stop sponsoring Australian WorldTour team after 2017". Cycling Weekly. Cycling Weekly.
  12. ^ "Orica's Ian Smith confesses to 'aggressive' behaviour". Sydney Morning Herald.
  13. ^ "Groundwater Treatment Plant (GTP)". Groundwater Cleanup Project. Orica Limited.
  14. ^ a b c Tovey, Josephine (28 September 2011). "Orica releases mercury vapour". The Sydney Morning Herald.
  15. ^ a b c Vincent, Michael (28 September 2011). "Orica's safety record under fire after leak". ABC News. Australia.
  16. ^ Tovey, Josephine (29 September 2011). "Orica leak prompts call for pollution law revamp". Sydney Morning Herald. Copyright © 2015 Fairfax Media. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  17. ^ "Independent review into off-site mercury at Orica Botany". NSW Environmental Protection Authority. 14 February 2014. Retrieved 25 May 2014.
  18. ^ "Orica breach deeply concerning - New South Wales Government". Herald Sun. 18 January 2012.
  19. ^ "Orica reports mercury leak from Sydney site". 702 ABC Sydney. 18 January 2012.
  20. ^ "Another breach at Orica plant". Daily Telegraph. Australia. 18 January 2012.
  21. ^ "Orica charged over toxic chemical leaks in Queensland". The Australian. 9 June 2012.
  22. ^ "Orica facing fines for Gladstone Harbour releases". ABC News. Australia. 8 June 2012.
  23. ^ "Orica uses enemy's ammunition to return fire". The Australian. 11 June 2012.
  24. ^ Metherell, Lexi (28 September 2011). "Toxic leak in Sydney's suburbs". AM (ABC Radio) (transcript). Australia. Retrieved 29 September 2011.
  25. ^ a b "Orica leak sparks pollution law concerns". The Sydney Morning Herald. 13 November 2011.
  26. ^ Wilson, Neil (15 November 2011). "Investors turn toxic on Orica after second plant leak". Herald Sun. Retrieved 25 May 2014.
  27. ^ Fragnos, John (28 August 2011). "Health risk assessment of hexavalent chromium release at Orica Kooragang Island" (PDF) (PDF). NSW Health. p. 2. Retrieved 25 May 2014.
  28. ^ "Revised figures reveal that lower levels of hexavalent chromium were present at Stockton" (Press release). NSW Office of Environment and Heritage. 15 February 2012.
  29. ^ "Orica welcomes revised Chromium VI results" (PDF) (PDF). Orica Limited. 15 February 2012.
  30. ^ Fragnos, John (28 August 2011). "Health risk assessment of hexavalent chromium release at Orica Kooragang Island" (PDF) (PDF). NSW Health. p. 2.
  31. ^ "Health advice over Orica spill". NBN News. 12 August 2011.
  32. ^ "Orica incident: Orica hexavalent chromium emission incident, Kooragang Island". NSW Environmental Protection Authority. 25 July 2013. Retrieved 25 May 2014.
  33. ^ "Orica spills arsenic into Hunter River". Newcastle Herald. 19 August 2011.
  34. ^ a b c Rice, Deborah (20 August 2011). "Orica chemical spill infuriates residents" (streaming video). ABC News. Australia: YouTube.
  35. ^ Ford, Mazoe (20 August 2011). "Second leak" (streaming video). Channel 10 News. YouTube.
  36. ^ a b McDonald, Philippa (10 November 2011). "Orica plant shut down after ammonia leak" (streaming video). ABC News. Australia: YouTube.
  37. ^ "Orica's crisis of confidence". Newcastle Herald. 11 November 2011.
  38. ^ a b c "Latest Orica leak coincides with legal action". ABC News. Australia. 9 November 2011.
  39. ^ "Another leak halts Orica restart operation". Herald Sun. 7 December 2011.
  40. ^ "Residents anger over latest Orica leak". ABC News. Australia. 8 December 2011.
  41. ^ "Lightning sets fire to Orica gas discharge". Newcastle Herald. 9 January 2012.
  42. ^ "Port Kembla acid leak at Orica plant sparks investigation". Illawarra Mercury. 17 December 2011.
  43. ^ Harvey, Adam (17 December 2011). "EPA wants report on latest Orica leak". ABC News. Australia.
  44. ^ "Targets & Performance". Sustainability Index. Orica Limited. 2007. p. 19.
  45. ^ "Dynamite blast on truck kills 23 in Mexico". CNN. 10 September 2007.
  46. ^ "Reportan 37 muertos por explosión en Coahuila". El Universal - Los Estados (in Spanish). Mexico. 10 September 2007.

Oricacc (talk) 03:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Oricacc, and thank you for your suggestions. Unfortunately, your proposed text is too promotional and does not adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising, marketing or public relations, but the purpose of your proposed text is clearly to win over prospective customers and investors. As such, it cannot be added to the article unless it is substantially rewritten. The most obvious red flags are phrases that are frequently used in press releases, but are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. These promotional terms include phrases such as "global leader," "commitment to the safety, health and wellbeing of its people and customers," and the entirety of the "Our purpose," "Our strategy," and "Our values" sections. You see, a Wikipedia article is not supposed to act as a corporate "About us" page. Just as importantly, watch out for sentences that sound vaguely positive, but don't actually tell the reader anything specific. They should be condensed and written more tersely.
If you would like to have just the financial figures updated, I can easily do that for you. But any modifications of the text that could be seen as promotional will face much heavier scrutiny. Best, Altamel (talk) 01:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your feedback Altamel, this was very helpful. I have revised the proposed edits above in lieu of your feedback and Wikipedia's policies to ensure a neutral tone and position. Please advise if these edits would be suitable for publishing. Regards --Oricacc (talk) 03:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Style

edit

Language

edit

Rephrase "pick-up and a trailer" re. incident. —DIV (128.250.80.15 (talk) 23:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC))Reply

Undue weight?

edit

I'm not generally a wikipedia editor so forgive me if I'm doing this wrong, but I just happened across this article and it seems to me that the "Incidents" section is way out of balance with the rest of the article in length (it seems to be more than half the article!), and focuses entirely on incidents since 2007 and almost entirely on incidents since 2011, all within Australia. Perhaps this section should be shrunk down or the size of the rest of the article increased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.32.176.234 (talk) 21:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

australia

edit

Orica incidents could end up in court, AAP, September 28, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.108.227 (talk) 00:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Content

edit

I think that someone messed with the article by writing "With the growing global financial crisis, the Orica board opted to restructure its entire workforce. As of September 2013, the entire Orica workforce is composed of 100,000 Minions under their new line manager, Malanie Tran." in the History section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranic16 (talkcontribs) 13:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Incidents in Australia

edit

This section needs restructuring. There are six incidents listed under "Kooragang Island"

- Hexavalent chromium leak (KI)

- Arsenic leak into Hunter river (KI)

- Mercury vapours (Botany)

- Ammonia leak (KI)

- Ammonium nitrate leak (KI)

- Sulfuric acid leak (Port Kembla)

but two of them were not at KI. The mercury vapours leak at Botany is described three paragraphs earlier, while the sulfuric acid leak is described (correctly) under Port Kembla six paragraphs later.

The paragraph about the six incidents should be relocated to follow the In Australia heading. Perhaps list the incidents in chronological order rather than by site?

Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 05:54, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply