skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

AI-Mediated Communication: Language Use and Interpersonal Effects in a Referential Communication Task

Published: 22 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

AI-Mediated Communication (AI-MC) is interpersonal communication that involves an artificially intelligent system that can modify, augment, or even generate content to achieve communicative and relational goals. AI-MC is increasingly involved in human communication and has the potential to impact core aspects of human communication, such as language production, interpersonal perception and task performance. Through a between-subjects experimental design we examine how these processes are influenced when integrating AI-generated language in the form of suggested text responses (Google's smart replies) into a text-based referential communication task. Our study replicates and extends the impacts of a positivity bias in AI-generated language and introduces the adjacency pair framework into the study of AI-MC. We also find preliminary yet mixed evidence to suggest that AI-generated language has the potential to undermine some dimensions of interpersonal perception, such as social attraction. This study contributes important concepts for future work in AI-MC and offers findings with implications for the design of AI systems in human-to-human communication.

References

[1]
2015. Email Statistics Report, 2015--2019. https://www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Email-Statistics-Report-2015--2019-Executive-Summary.pdf
[2]
Kenneth C Arnold, Krysta Chauncey, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2018. Sentiment bias in predictive text recommendations results in biased writing. In Graphics Interface. 8--11.
[3]
Kenneth C Arnold, Krysta Chauncey, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2020. Predictive text encourages predictable writing. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 128--138.
[4]
Diane S Berry, JamesWPennebaker, Jennifer S Mueller, andWendy S Hiller. 1997. Linguistic bases of social perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23, 5 (1997), 526--537.
[5]
Greg Bullock. 2017. Save time with Smart Reply in Gmail. https://www.blog.google/products/gmail/save-time-withsmart- reply-in-gmail/
[6]
Judee K Burgoon. 1993. Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 12, 1--2 (1993), 30--48.
[7]
Herbert H Clark and Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22, 1 (1986), 1--39.
[8]
John H Connolly, Roel M Vismans, Christopher S Butler, and Richard A Gatward. 2011. Discourse and pragmatics in Functional Grammar. Vol. 18. Walter de Gruyter.
[9]
Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Michael Gamon, and Susan Dumais. 2011. Mark my words! Linguistic style accommodation in social media. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. 745--754.
[10]
Roy W Feinson. 1988. Interpretive tone telecommunication method and apparatus. US Patent 4,754,474.
[11]
Susan T Fiske, Juan Xu, Amy C Cuddy, and Peter Glick. 1999. (Dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of social issues 55, 3 (1999), 473--489.
[12]
Pamela Gibbons, Jon Busch, and James J Bradac. 1991. Powerful versus powerless language: Consequences for persuasion, impression formation, and cognitive response. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 10, 2 (1991), 115--133.
[13]
Amy L Gonzales, Jeffrey T Hancock, and James W Pennebaker. 2010. Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research 37, 1 (2010), 3--19.
[14]
Jeffrey T Hancock and Philip J Dunham. 2001. Language use in computer-mediated communication: The role of coordination devices. Discourse Processes 31, 1 (2001), 91--110.
[15]
Jeffrey T Hancock, Mor Naaman, and Karen Levy. 2020. AI-Mediated Communication: Definition, Research Agenda, and Ethical Considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 25, 1 (2020), 89--100.
[16]
Matthew Henderson, Rami Al-Rfou, Brian Strope, Yun-Hsuan Sung, László Lukács, Ruiqi Guo, Sanjiv Kumar, Balint Miklos, and Ray Kurzweil. 2017. Efficient natural language response suggestion for smart reply. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.00652 (2017).
[17]
Jess Hohenstein and Malte Jung. 2018. AI-Supported Messaging: An Investigation of Human-Human Text Conversation with AI Support. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--6.
[18]
Jess Hohenstein and Malte Jung. 2020. AI as a moral crumple zone: The effects of AI-mediated communication on attribution and trust. Computers in Human Behavior 106 (2020), 106190.
[19]
Deborah Son Holoien and Susan T Fiske. 2013. Downplaying positive impressions: Compensation between warmth and competence in impression management. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49, 1 (2013), 33--41.
[20]
Clayton J Hutto and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
[21]
Maurice Jakesch, Megan French, Xiao Ma, Jeffrey T Hancock, and Mor Naaman. 2019. AI-Mediated Communication: How the Perception that Profile Text was Written by AI Affects Trustworthiness. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[22]
Emily Jamison and Iryna Gurevych. 2014. Adjacency Pair Recognition in Wikipedia Discussions using Lexical Pairs. In Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing. 479--488.
[23]
Anjuli Kannan, Karol Kurach, Sujith Ravi, Tobias Kaufmann, Andrew Tomkins, Balint Miklos, Greg Corrado, Laszlo Lukacs, Marina Ganea, Peter Young, et al. 2016. Smart reply: Automated response suggestion for email. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 955--964.
[24]
James C McCroskey and Thomas A McCain. 1974. The measurement of interpersonal attraction. (1974).
[25]
Joseph Edward McGrath. 1984. Groups: Interaction and performance. Vol. 14. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[26]
James W Pennebaker, Ryan L Boyd, Kayla Jordan, and Kate Blackburn. 2015. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Technical Report.
[27]
Martin J Pickering and Simon Garrod. 2013. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and brain sciences 36, 4 (2013), 329--347.
[28]
Emanuel A Schegloff and Harvey Sacks. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 8, 4 (1973), 289--327.
[29]
Tom Simonite. 2020. As Machines Get Smarter, How Will We Relate to Them? https://www.wired.com/story/asmachines-get-smarter-how-will-we-relate-to-them/
[30]
Yue Weng, Huaixiu Zheng, Franziska Bell, and Gokhan Tur. 2019. OCC: A Smart Reply System for Efficient In-App Communications. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2596--2603.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Beyond the ScreenHyperautomation in Business and Society10.4018/979-8-3693-3354-9.ch014(266-285)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Experimental and model studies of the influence of AI on the evolution of collective consciousnessЦифровая экономика10.34706/DE-2024-03-05(38-44)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Perceptions of Professionalism and Authenticity in AI-Assisted WritingBusiness and Professional Communication Quarterly10.1177/23294906241233224Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. AI-Mediated Communication: Language Use and Interpersonal Effects in a Referential Communication Task

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
    CSCW
    April 2021
    5016 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3460939
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 April 2021
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ai-mediated communication
    2. impression formation
    3. linguistic alignment
    4. sentiment
    5. tasks

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,209
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)150
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Beyond the ScreenHyperautomation in Business and Society10.4018/979-8-3693-3354-9.ch014(266-285)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Experimental and model studies of the influence of AI on the evolution of collective consciousnessЦифровая экономика10.34706/DE-2024-03-05(38-44)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Perceptions of Professionalism and Authenticity in AI-Assisted WritingBusiness and Professional Communication Quarterly10.1177/23294906241233224Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Talk2Care: An LLM-based Voice Assistant for Communication between Healthcare Providers and Older AdultsProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36596258:2(1-35)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
    • (2024)In Whose Voice?: Examining AI Agent Representation of People in Social Interaction through Generative SpeechProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661555(224-245)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Mediating Culture: Cultivating Socio-cultural Understanding of AI in Children through Participatory DesignProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661515(1805-1822)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)The AI Ghostwriter Effect: When Users do not Perceive Ownership of AI-Generated Text but Self-Declare as AuthorsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363787531:2(1-40)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Designing the Conversational Agent: Asking Follow-up Questions for Information ElicitationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373208:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Akal Badi ya Bias: An Exploratory Study of Gender Bias in Hindi Language TechnologyProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3659017(1926-1939)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
    • (2024)The Role of Inclusion, Control, and Ownership in Workplace AI-Mediated CommunicationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642650(1-10)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media