User talk:Chatsam
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
--SieBot 17:19, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
archive
[edit]
Blason de la commune de Xouaxange
[edit]Bonjour Chatsam,
Je te contacte de la part de la municipalité de Xouaxange (57). Accepterais-tu que la mairie puisse utiliser le blason que tu a redessiné pour Wikipédia ? Sous quelles conditions ? Je t'invites à répondre directement au maire de Xouaxange à mairiexouaxange
wanadoo.fr
Merci d'avance pour ton retour. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorran63 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Why ?
[edit]Why do you cancel this category ? --DenghiùComm (talk) 12:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- because is not good.--Chatsam (talk) 12:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Is this an answer ? --DenghiùComm (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- vilene in herarldique "sex in différent color" not in erection. --Chatsam (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Renommage monogramme
[edit]Bonjour, je ne comprends pas très bien ta demande de renommage. Il s'agit de la marque du parfum Chypre [1]. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 21:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- on m'a demandé de faire ce fichier avec ce nom donc merci de laisser comme demandé. ou de voir avec DDupard --Chatsam (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ce n'est pas un argument
. Le problème est de choisir un nom qui ne prête pas à confusion, ce qui était le cas du nom du fichier et de sa description antérieurs, laissant croire qu'il s'agissait du monogramme d'une personne, alors qu'il s'agit de la marque d'un produit. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 21:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- moi je m'en moque. c'est à voir avec lui car c'est sa demande. --Chatsam (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- C'est toi qui les a téléversés. Je crains d'ailleurs que, s'agissant de dérivatifs de créations originales protégées par une marque déposée, les fichiers ne puissent être conservés sur Commons. Voir COM:PACKAGING. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 21:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- si le logo avait été celui de Chypre je l'aurais pas fait mais la c'est les initiales de coty. peu m'importe j'ai laissé un mot à DDupard. bye. --Chatsam (talk) 08:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Je ne mets pas en doute ta bonne foi, mais il s'agit manifestement du logo du parfum comme le montre la publication ci-dessus. De quelle source es-tu partie ? Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 11:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- La source initiale donnée est là: [2] + click on the image.--DDupard (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- En lisant l'échange ci dessus, c'était (compris) par moi comme le monogramme d'une personne. Maintenant étant donné le succès iconique du parfum, (et du créateur - à cette époque), il a été enregistré et apposé sur l'emballage du produit.--DDupard (talk) 12:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- La source initiale donnée est là: [2] + click on the image.--DDupard (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Je ne mets pas en doute ta bonne foi, mais il s'agit manifestement du logo du parfum comme le montre la publication ci-dessus. De quelle source es-tu partie ? Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 11:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- si le logo avait été celui de Chypre je l'aurais pas fait mais la c'est les initiales de coty. peu m'importe j'ai laissé un mot à DDupard. bye. --Chatsam (talk) 08:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- C'est toi qui les a téléversés. Je crains d'ailleurs que, s'agissant de dérivatifs de créations originales protégées par une marque déposée, les fichiers ne puissent être conservés sur Commons. Voir COM:PACKAGING. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 21:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- moi je m'en moque. c'est à voir avec lui car c'est sa demande. --Chatsam (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ce n'est pas un argument
Chatsam, merci de veiller à respecter Commons:DW/fr (si pas clair me demander). Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 12:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Racconish: Oui pas clair, c'est quoi un changement de licence vers une licence plus appropriée, pourriez vous aider, clarifier, pointer vers texte ad hoc ?--DDupard (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Il y a deux aspects ici. Le premier concerne la notion d’œuvre dérivée, au sens de la recommandation que j'ai indiquée ci-dessus. Une œuvre dérivée, en particulier une reproduction, ne confère généralement pas de droit patrimonial à son créateur, la titularité restant entre les mains du détenteur des droits sur l’œuvre sous-jacente/reproduite. Pour cette raison, j'ai signalé à Chatsam qu'il faut veiller à bien préciser la source des oeuvres dérivées téléversées sur Commons, afin que l'on puisse vérifier si cette source est dans le domaine public ou sous une licence libre autorisant les œuvres dérivées. Le second problème, qu'une telle précision aurait permis de repérer plus rapidement, est qu'en la circonstance l’œuvre adaptée est une création originale, revendiquée comme telle dans un enregistrement de copyright, figurant sur un emballage. En résumé, tout le monde peut se tromper mais c'est une bonne pratique à appliquer que d'indiquer la source et de ne pas faire comme si le seul fait d'avoir redessiné quelque chose vous conférait un droit patrimonial sur ce dessin. Je prends un exemple concret : File:Sceau de François Coty.svg. L'image d'origine est dans le domaine public en raison de son ancienneté. Celle téléversée sur Commons en est une oeuvre dérivative et devrait soit porter une indication de domaine public, si l'on considère que le dessin est une copie fidèle, soit porter la double indication d'une source dans le domaine public et d'une adaptation mise sous licence CC-BY-SA. Mais la seule indication d'une licence CC-BY-SA avec la seule attribution à Chatsam est insuffisante. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 08:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Pour ce dernier cas, il s'agit d'une adaptation reprenant les meubles du modèle (des modèles) : phoenix (la représentation de l'oiseau est en effet différente) + tertre + étoiles. Merci de bien vouloir aider en indiquant aussi précisément que possible ce qu'il conviendrait d'ajouter.--DDupard (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Déjà dit ci-dessus : il faut indiquer la source de l’œuvre dérivée et son statut en matière de copyright. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 18:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Excusez, mais je ne comprends toujours pas ce qu'il faut ajouter, je cite : il faut indiquer la source de l’œuvre dérivée et son (se réfère à quoi) statut en matière de copyright, n'est ce pas déjà le cas ?--DDupard (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Son → celui de la source. Par ailleurs, mes remarques ci-dessus s'adressaient à Chatsam. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 06:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oui, j'interviens ici juste parce que je me sens une responsabilité, Chatsam a réalisé un travail graphique très réussi et très utile, je lui en suis reconnaissante. Je ne voudrais pas qu'elle rencontre des difficultés pour cela. Je comprends également que vous souhaitez l'informer des indications à porter sur le fichier après téléchargement. Hey, Cheers, Bon weekend! --DDupard (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Je me réjouis que vous ayez compris le sens de mon intervention. Il ne s'agit pas de "morigéner" qui que ce soit pour une erreur mais d'expliquer pourquoi l'image ne peut pas rester sur Commons, le cas échéant, et de donner les conseils appropriés. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 10:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oui, j'interviens ici juste parce que je me sens une responsabilité, Chatsam a réalisé un travail graphique très réussi et très utile, je lui en suis reconnaissante. Je ne voudrais pas qu'elle rencontre des difficultés pour cela. Je comprends également que vous souhaitez l'informer des indications à porter sur le fichier après téléchargement. Hey, Cheers, Bon weekend! --DDupard (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Son → celui de la source. Par ailleurs, mes remarques ci-dessus s'adressaient à Chatsam. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 06:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Excusez, mais je ne comprends toujours pas ce qu'il faut ajouter, je cite : il faut indiquer la source de l’œuvre dérivée et son (se réfère à quoi) statut en matière de copyright, n'est ce pas déjà le cas ?--DDupard (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Déjà dit ci-dessus : il faut indiquer la source de l’œuvre dérivée et son statut en matière de copyright. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 18:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Pour ce dernier cas, il s'agit d'une adaptation reprenant les meubles du modèle (des modèles) : phoenix (la représentation de l'oiseau est en effet différente) + tertre + étoiles. Merci de bien vouloir aider en indiquant aussi précisément que possible ce qu'il conviendrait d'ajouter.--DDupard (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Il y a deux aspects ici. Le premier concerne la notion d’œuvre dérivée, au sens de la recommandation que j'ai indiquée ci-dessus. Une œuvre dérivée, en particulier une reproduction, ne confère généralement pas de droit patrimonial à son créateur, la titularité restant entre les mains du détenteur des droits sur l’œuvre sous-jacente/reproduite. Pour cette raison, j'ai signalé à Chatsam qu'il faut veiller à bien préciser la source des oeuvres dérivées téléversées sur Commons, afin que l'on puisse vérifier si cette source est dans le domaine public ou sous une licence libre autorisant les œuvres dérivées. Le second problème, qu'une telle précision aurait permis de repérer plus rapidement, est qu'en la circonstance l’œuvre adaptée est une création originale, revendiquée comme telle dans un enregistrement de copyright, figurant sur un emballage. En résumé, tout le monde peut se tromper mais c'est une bonne pratique à appliquer que d'indiquer la source et de ne pas faire comme si le seul fait d'avoir redessiné quelque chose vous conférait un droit patrimonial sur ce dessin. Je prends un exemple concret : File:Sceau de François Coty.svg. L'image d'origine est dans le domaine public en raison de son ancienneté. Celle téléversée sur Commons en est une oeuvre dérivative et devrait soit porter une indication de domaine public, si l'on considère que le dessin est une copie fidèle, soit porter la double indication d'une source dans le domaine public et d'une adaptation mise sous licence CC-BY-SA. Mais la seule indication d'une licence CC-BY-SA avec la seule attribution à Chatsam est insuffisante. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 08:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Maison forte de Mornay 106.jpg
[edit]
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Maison forte de Mornay 106.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
— Racconish 💬 12:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Bon, @Chatsam: , j'ai ajouté le nom du graveur qui est mort environ 1912, donc ça devrait être ok pour Domaine public (PD), l'artiste est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, => normalement les droits d'auteur sont expirés. Si tu pouvais donner une source pour la photo ; bouquin, musée, ça devrait satisfaire tout le monde. Cheers.--DDupard (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- merci ça devait être un livre mais ça remonte à trop loin. a+ --Chatsam (talk) 08:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 |
File:Chypre monogram.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
— Racconish 💬 12:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
|
File:Chypre Monogram 2.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
— Racconish 💬 12:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Un grand merci à l'artiste wiki graphiste. DDupard (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC) |
- merci et à bientôt. --Chatsam (talk) 08:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
N'y a-t-il pas un blason sur la photo? J'aurais aimé la classer dans une catégorie plus précise, mais j'ai cru bien faire en le laissant aux experts. —Iketsi (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- coucou,
- Généralement quand c'est pas un élément majeur de la photo je le "déclasse" si je puis dire.
- Vu que je ne sais pas dans quoi le classer!!! Je viens de mettre dans "coats of arms of France to be classified" sauf que cette catégorie est rarement nettoyé. a+ dans le bus Chatsam (talk) 08:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hôpital Laennec de Paris carre jardin 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Merci pour le message sur ma page de discussion, même si c'est un simple conseil, cela m'a été très utile !! A history lover (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC) |
Rejoignez le jury WLM de l’édition 2021
[edit]Bonjour Chatsam
La nouvelle édition de WLM est en cours de préparation comme vous pouvez le voir sur rétro-planning Wiki_Loves_Monuments - 2021
La composition du jury est en cours de constitution.
En tant que lauréat de l'édition précédente, accepteriez-vous de participer cette année ?
Votre rôle consistera principalement à sélectionner les lauréats de l'édition 2021 selon ce qui expliqué sur le fonctionnement du jury et, si vous avez le temps, de participer à l'animation du concours durant le mois de septembre avec la photo du jour.
Il consistera également à accompagner le/la président/e du jury pour la rédaction du discours comme dans l'exemple de 2018
Au plaisir de vous lire,
Pour le concours français de WLM, ArkéoTopia (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Cher Chatsam, plusieurs réponses favorables nous ont été retournées. Le groupe est donc complet. Toutefois, pourriez-vous nous indiquer si vous accepteriez de rejoindre le jury pour l'édition 2022. Au plaisir de vous lire ArkéoTopia (talk) 10:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Terruella matilla joaquim marina l'estartit.jpg
- File:Terruella matilla joaquim platja de port de llança.jpg
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Plus généralement, il faut indiquer le nom du peintre (et si possible un lien ou la date de son décès) pour toutes les images que vous avez importees. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Blason ville fr Caraman 31.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
180.214.233.87 03:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Parthenay buste robert bigot.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2A01:CB00:A05:D100:94E9:EEDF:487F:36B0 19:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
My files
[edit]Delete all my files — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaziFarid099 (talk • contribs) 08:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ArkéoTopia (talk) 15:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : ArkéoTopia.
And also:
- File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 06.jpg ( Nominator : ArkéoTopia | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 01.jpg )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : ArkéoTopia.
And also:
- File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 05.jpg ( Nominator : ArkéoTopia | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 01.jpg )
- File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 04.jpg ( Nominator : ArkéoTopia | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 01.jpg )
- File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 02.jpg ( Nominator : ArkéoTopia | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 01.jpg )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
|
File:Blason mours.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
|
File:Blason nointel.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Pile de bagdad.svg
[edit]Hi! Thanks for telling me that you've reverted my edits, but what was the problem? --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:21, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- I used the Commons:SVG Translate tool to add an English translation of the text, in addition to the French, not replacing it. This meant that the image used French text when it appeared on on fr.wikipedia.org, and English text on en.wikipedia.org. Was that not working properly? I checked fr.wikipedia.org after making my changes, and I thought the text was showing in French.
- (Thank you for making the diagram!) --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this is a german coat of arms. Maybe it is related to the publisher or to the name underneath (James Gordon etc...). Or something else. So the category "Coats of arms to be classified" is better.--GerritR (talk) 20:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- you can revet if you want.--Chatsam (talk) 20:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
File:Wappen Malerei 1.jpg
[edit]Why do you think this is German? It could be from anywhere. A look at the discussion before reverting could be useful.--GerritR (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Maubeuge
[edit]Salut,
Ces œuvres sont-elles exposées à la chapelle du Collège des Jésuites à Maubeuge ?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Plan_du_chapitre_des_chanoinesses_1956.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:La_place_de_maubeuge_en_1893_hermance_wirtz.jpg
Amicalement,
Arflhn (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- oui les 3 mais je pense que c'était une expo temporaire. a+ --Chatsam (talk) 18:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Lagrevol
[edit]Bonjour Chatsam Le blason utilisé sur la page de la famille de Lagrevol sur WP est inexact. Voici un lien sur le blason tel qu'il est correctement présenté : https://memorial-genweb.org/heraldique/base/data/media/26/7577-lagrevol.png Mais apparemment le dessin n'est pas libre de droits.... Grand merci ! --Hubert de Vauplane (talk) 10:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- désolé mais je n'arrive pas à aller sur la page du site. J'en parle au projet blason. a+ --Chatsam (talk) 15:15, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Why Celbusro is no longer active?
[edit]Why Celbusro is no longer active after this last upload? Or he is possibly replaced by Thom.lanaud since November 2018? Heraldrist (talk) 04:27, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- maybe but is not important for me. --Chatsam (talk) 06:20, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Chatsam, you're the third friend of Heraldrist
[edit]Chatsam, I claimed you're the friend of Heraldrist. I like to working on French and Spanish heraldry. Heraldrist (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- hello, good day to you. ;-) --Chatsam (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, Chatsam. You're the best friend of Heraldrist and this is the final friend of Heraldrist. Heraldrist (talk) 07:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Blason chatsam.svg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Blason chatsam.svg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Blason chatsam.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Do not uncategorize my files, or at least give me a reason.
[edit]Hello Chatsam, in these days i've seen that you removed some of the categories on my files about italian municipalities CoA, and added "Coats of arms of Italy to be classified" which has no meaning, because they were classified as SVG coats of arms of municipalities of Liguria/Italy. I ask you to tell me why you do this, Thanks. Ashoppio (talk) 17:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Blason d'Estinnes
[edit]Bonjour Chatsam,
Le versement est ancien, mais quand je lis le blasonnement de File:Blason ville be Estinnes.svg, il me semble qu'il manque deux étoiles sur le dessin.
Cordialement. H2O(talk) 11:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- merci pour ton alerte c'est un bug d'affichage des clones. a+ --Chatsam
(coucou) 17:55, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=538885591&oldid=537903870){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
A propos du blason de Varize-Vaudoncourt
[edit]Bonjour,
J'ai une question à propos du blason (ou devrais-je dire "les blasons") de Varize-Vaudoncourt (File:Blason ville fr Varize-Vaudoncourt 57.svg). Sur quel modèle êtes-vous basé pour réaliser ce blason ? Car lorsque je recherche sur internet ce blason, je n'en trouve aucun qui est identique au votre, il a toujours des différences.
Cordialement,
SpectraKo (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Je me servais de la banque du blason (gaso) à l'époque mais tu pouvais aussi le trouver sur le site de la commune en 2012 voir sur https://armorialdefrance.fr/page_blason.php?ville=6671 . après pour un blason tu peux trouver autant de version que de dessinateur tant que cela colle au texte (blasonnement). a+ --Chatsam (coucou) 20:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 11:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, why did you revert high resolution image to a cropped lower resolution one? (Asking as you did not provide explanation in the edit description) Ankry (talk) 14:07, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- hi, this image is very dark compared to the other. --Chatsam (coucou) 18:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- So do you suggest to split the page/file history and keep both as separate versions? Ankry (talk) 01:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- it's not important. --Chatsam (coucou) 18:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- it's not important. --Chatsam
- So do you suggest to split the page/file history and keep both as separate versions? Ankry (talk) 01:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Blason des lansade
[edit]Bonjour Chatsam,
Je voie que vous avez changer la catégorie du blason des Lansade dans la page et je me demander si c'était possible pour vous de faire une autre version Projet blason du blason de la famille sur une de votre page et si vous voulez vraiment vous pouvez m'aider à créer une page wikipédia pour la famille Lansade, merci
Cordialement, Tim Tim200714 (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- vous aidez à la créer non, par contre je veux bien passer derriere et corriger ce que je peux. Laissez-moi un message sur ma PU wikipedia.fr avec le liens de votre article ou même votre brouillon et je regarderais. a+--Chatsam (coucou) 18:11, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- d'accord je ferais ça Tim200714 (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Voici l'article Famille Lansade allez dans Voir Historique , la page à impérativement besoin des références et des informations, si vous ne pouvez pas contacter quelqu'un qui a le temps, merci d'avance Tim200714 (talk) 23:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I think a language issue has led to a misunderstanding here. In French (e.g. in the blazon in the image description), you would be correct to use bezanté broadly, but in English, which is the language the categories are set up in, bezanté refers to roundels Or; roundels vert are pommes. Hence, "semy of pommes" is correct and "bezantée" is incorrect. (If "semy of pommes" is felt to be too ambiguous a name, with French users liable to interpret it to mean semy of apples, we could rename the category "semy of roundels vert".) -sche (talk) 19:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Pour le coup, je ne connais pas cette distinction de l'heraldique anglais. Avez vous des sources pour cette appélation. a+ --Chatsam (coucou) 19:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Outre w:Roundel (heraldry) / w:fr:Besant et tourteau (et la SCA):
- Henry Gough, A Glossary of Terms Used in British Heraldry (1847), page 253: "POMEY a roundle vert. The name is derived from the French pomme, an apple."
- Charles Boutell, English Heraldry (1867): pp. 71-72: "The first group contains the two Roundles of the Metals, which are flat discs: 1, The Bezant, or golden Roundle, [...] 2, The Silver Roundle, or Plate, is from the Spanish "Plata"—silver. When Bezants or Plates appear in considerable numbers, the field on which they are charged is said to be "bezantée" or "plattée." See No. 140. The second group contains the five Roundles of the Colours, which are [...] The Torteau, No. 152, in the plural Torteaux, is gules: the Hurt is azure: the Pellet or Ogress is sable: the Pomme is vert: and the Golpe is purpure. [...] the early Heralds [used] the terms "Bezant," "Plate," and "Torteau," with the general designations "Roundle" and "Pellet," adding the tinctures."
- So, no objection to using "semy of roundels vert" instead, but avez vous des sources pour appeler semé of roundels vert "bezanté"? Autant que je sache, même en français un wikt:fr:besant est d'or ou d'argent; un disque de sinople, si elle n'est pas appelée spécifiquement wikt:fr:pomme, est appelé un wikt:fr:tourteau sinople (angl. roundel vert), pas un besant. N'est-ce pas le cas? -sche (talk) 21:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Outre w:Roundel (heraldry) / w:fr:Besant et tourteau (et la SCA):
argent vêtu de sinople, ou sinople vêtu d'argent ?
[edit]Au fait, peut-être que vous pouvez aider à cette question: File:Blason ville fr Arques (Aude).svg, est-elle "coupé d'argent et de sinople, vêtu de l'un en l'autre" (comme la description), ou "coupé de sinople et d'argent, vêtu de l'un en l'autre" (comme File:Blason ville fr Châteney 70.svg#int:filedesc, qui semble identique mais est décrite de manière opposée) ? -sche (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg#int:filedesc){kind=link}
- bonjour la vignette la plus ancienne est coupé d'argent.. mais la version actuel est coupé de sinople et d'argent... a+ --Chatsam (coucou) 19:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
C'è uno stemma da rimuovere
[edit]Ci sono alcuni stemme illegali e mai concessi da rimuovere perché carricate erroneamente. Non sono stati caricati da me ma conosco personalmente chi li ha caricarti il quale ha perso l'accesso a Wikipedia commons DemCom44 (talk) 10:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
File:The Peel collection and the Dutch school of painting (IA cu31924016777371).pdf
[edit]Why "german"? By the way, the word dutch does not not mean german, it means from the Netherlands. So where are the german coats of arms? GerritR (talk) 14:28, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- sorry i thought "dutch" was "german". --Chatsam (coucou) 14:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- The coat of arms is still not classified! Description (for example "3 arrows" etc.) is no classification.--GerritR (talk) 08:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Merci beaucoup pour la photo de l'église Saint-Antoine-de-Padoue du Chesnay. Pierre1375 (talk) 19:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC) |
Bonjour,
[edit]Bonjour Chatsam,
Je suis Tяuc alias Kontributor 2K, que tu aperçus plus d'une fois dans ta liste de suivi.
Je te contacte car, considérant les délais qui s'allongent dans les demandes de renommage R4 (concernant les blasons), ainsi que dans les R3 (où cela risque même d'être refusé), je souhaitais te poser la question suivante : n'aurais-tu pas dans l'idée de demander à accéder aux droits de renommeur de fichiers, afin d'apporter un concours supplémentaire au projet blasons ?
Cordialement, --Kontributor 2K (talk) 15:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- voila qui est choses faites. --Chatsam (coucou) 19:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour Chatsam,
- J'ai appris l'heureux événement par les voies officielles,
- Il y a présentement quatre fichiers en attente, en R4, qui n'ont pas trouvé de volontaire :
- Adhémar, une glorieuse famille originaire du Dauphiné et qui compte au moins trois branches.
- Dupuy, non moins glorieuse maison dont les rameaux sont plus nombreux encore.
- Warsberg : un fichier dont le renommage permettra d'éviter la création, redondante, d'une même image sous différents noms, un peu comme celui-ci qui figure le blason de différentes familles portant des armes identiques.
- Limpach : idem ci-dessus, déjà utilisé comme générique pour une autre famille (Berthout)
- Si le Warsberg ne convenait pas à cette utilisation, il devrait être possible de trouver un autre gueules-sautoir-argent, lui aussi uniquement destiné à un armorial, mais pas le Forceville qui doit être refait.
- Qu'en pensez-vous ?
- Cordialement, --Kontributor 2K (talk) 19:54, 4 september 2023 (UTC)
- En fait je ne suis pas sur que tes demandes soient pertinantes et adaptées donc vu que c'est un peu nouveau pour moi, je ne vais pas intervenir. Désolé. Chatsam (coucou) 20:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- C'est noté,
- Cordialement, --Kontributor 2K (talk) 21:00, 4 september 2023 (UTC)
- En fait je ne suis pas sur que tes demandes soient pertinantes et adaptées donc vu que c'est un peu nouveau pour moi, je ne vais pas intervenir. Désolé. Chatsam
_1.svg){kind=link}
Rename
[edit]Hi Chatsam, thank you for renaming this file. However, the uploader explained me that the web site of the municipality has the wrong information, the correct one is on the Diocese of Aosta web site. Because I was wrong, can you revert the rename? Sorry for my mistake, municipalities web sites in general are reliable sources, but not in this case. Thank you. Pạtạfisik 09:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, j'ai lu trop tard que vous ne lisez pas l'anglais. Je disais: Bonjour Chatsam, merci d'avoir renommé ce fichier. Cependant, l'uploader m'a expliqué que le site web de la commune contient des informations erronées, les bonnes se trouvant sur le site web du Diocèse d'Aoste. Puisque je me suis trompée, pouvez-vous annuler le renommage ? Désolé pour mon erreur, les sites web des municipalités sont en général des sources fiables, mais pas dans ce cas. Merci en avance, Pạtạfisik 10:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Blason ville fr Chambon 17.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2001:448A:11A0:1602:B882:FB9A:4DA:103 07:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Blason Angeac-Charente
[edit]Bonjour Chatsam,
En passant par la catégorie Lozengy gules and or, je suis tombé sur ce fichier, après vérification il s'avère que la version de 2017 est erronée, la première version, conforme à la source et aux pages wp, est donc à rétablir, à l'occasion,
Cordialement, --Kontributor 2K (talk) 15:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- ??? la version de 2017 est annulée depuis 2023. c'est quoi le souci? --Chatsam (coucou) 05:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Absolument aucun, mon message date de nov. 2023
- Il y a eu du mouvement sur ta pdd vers 02:00… --Kontributor 2K (talk) 10:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- trop fatigué la fille j'ai eu une alerte comme quoi j'avais un message et je n'ai pas vue que la personne a annulé son message et j'ai pas fait attention à la date de ton messsage. desolé. --Chatsam (coucou) 11:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- C'est la faute aux insomniaques ou au décalage horaire…
- --Kontributor 2K (talk) 12:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- trop fatigué la fille j'ai eu une alerte comme quoi j'avais un message et je n'ai pas vue que la personne a annulé son message et j'ai pas fait attention à la date de ton messsage. desolé. --Chatsam
Catégories
[edit]Bonjour Chatsam,
Me revoici,
Il y a un problème avec les modifications de Heroldicas, qui souhaite remplacer les catégories "Coats-of-arms" par leur catégorie mère "Heraldry" - voir historique de l'utilisateur + pdd -
Peut-être est-ce une bonne idée…?
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 12:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- ou la la en anglais je suis plus une bille qu'en français. Il doit y avoir le meme rapport entre l'heraldique qui est la science du blason (forme, blassonnement, historique) et le blason qui est une image. je pense qu'il faut forcement faire une consultation globale. mais ou et comment!!!
- en tout cas je ne suis pas pour.
- essayes de voir avec un administrateur de commons. a+ et bon courage. --Chatsam (coucou) 17:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
|
|
File:Musée lille Hollandaise Jacqueline comerre-Paton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Blason
[edit]Bonjour Chatsam,
Il semble qu'il y ait une erreur de numéro, dans le nom de fichier du blason Vignory,
Cordialement,--Kontributor 2K (talk) 09:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- c'est fait. merci--Chatsam (coucou) 18:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 07.jpg
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 08.jpg
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 09.jpg
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 10.jpg
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 11.jpg
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 12.jpg
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 13.jpg
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 14.jpg
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 17.jpg
- File:St. Mariä Empfängnis 2022 18.jpg
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 15:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)